Tools & Wizards About Us
indg.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

indg.in

Vikaspedia : Landing Page

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

indg.in screenshot

About Website

Visit indg.in now to see the best up-to-date Indg content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indg.in

vikaspedia landing page

Visit indg.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Indg.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indg.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

indg.in

1260 ms

index

244 ms

index.css

224 ms

jquery-ui.css

439 ms

jquery.js

661 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Indg.in, 77% (20 requests) were made to Vikaspedia.in and 12% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Vikaspedia.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 540.9 kB (60%)

Content Size

895.3 kB

After Optimization

354.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Indg.in main page is 895.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 654.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 225.0 kB
  • After minification 223.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 525.5 kB

  • Original 654.0 kB
  • After minification 481.0 kB
  • After compression 128.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 525.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (61%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indg.in

indg.in

1260 ms

index

index

244 ms

index.css

index.css

224 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

439 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

661 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

452 ms

jspi

jspi

451 ms

indexGA.js

indexGA.js

451 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

1343 ms

landing.js

landing.js

656 ms

display.js

display.js

768 ms

mobile.js

mobile.js

766 ms

pramukhime.js

pramukhime.js

765 ms

pramukhindic.js

pramukhindic.js

1047 ms

87 ms

transliteration.css

transliteration.css

3 ms

transliteration.I.js

transliteration.I.js

10 ms

body-bg

body-bg

227 ms

LandingPageBg

LandingPageBg

223 ms

sprite

sprite

875 ms

down-arrow

down-arrow

225 ms

landing-img

landing-img

894 ms

mobile.css

mobile.css

225 ms

landscape.css

landscape.css

225 ms

suggestmenu_bg.png

suggestmenu_bg.png

75 ms

button-bg.png

button-bg.png

86 ms

SEO Factors

indg.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indg.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Indg.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indg.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: