Tools & Wizards About Us
indiatool.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

indiatool.net

Precision Measuring Instrument Manufacturers, Hardness Tester

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

493 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

412 ms

indiatool.net screenshot

About Website

Visit indiatool.net now to see the best up-to-date Indiatool content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indiatool.net

India Tools, leading Precision Measuring Instrument Manufacturers suppliers and exporters from India offer Hardness Tester, Thickness Gauge, Vibration Tester, etc

Visit indiatool.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Indiatool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 493 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indiatool.net performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.541

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indiatool.net

493 ms

indiatool.net

970 ms

www.indiatool.net

1131 ms

mail.css

324 ms

js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Indiatool.net, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Webclickindia.co.in. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Indiatool.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

461.4 kB

After Optimization

425.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indiatool.net main page is 461.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 309.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 43.0 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 172 B

  • Original 309.2 kB
  • After minification 309.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indiatool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 313 B

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 61.7 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 700 B

  • Original 47.5 kB
  • After minification 47.5 kB
  • After compression 46.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indiatool.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (60%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indiatool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indiatool.net

indiatool.net

493 ms

indiatool.net

indiatool.net

970 ms

www.indiatool.net

www.indiatool.net

1131 ms

mail.css

mail.css

324 ms

js

js

54 ms

js

js

100 ms

mail.js

mail.js

346 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

255 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

495 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

699 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

722 ms

animate.css

animate.css

720 ms

default.css

default.css

723 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

722 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

734 ms

ResponsiveAccordianMenu.css

ResponsiveAccordianMenu.css

931 ms

css

css

37 ms

india-tools-instruments-co-logo.png

india-tools-instruments-co-logo.png

241 ms

img-ultrasonic-thickness-gauges.jpg

img-ultrasonic-thickness-gauges.jpg

465 ms

img-tools-and-instruments.jpg

img-tools-and-instruments.jpg

242 ms

img-portable-hardness-tester.jpg

img-portable-hardness-tester.jpg

481 ms

img-infrared-thermometers.jpg

img-infrared-thermometers.jpg

242 ms

plus.png

plus.png

243 ms

mob.png

mob.png

481 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

120 ms

img-portable-hardness-tester.jpg

img-portable-hardness-tester.jpg

656 ms

img-roughness-tester.jpg

img-roughness-tester.jpg

901 ms

img-ultrasonic-thickness-gauges.jpg

img-ultrasonic-thickness-gauges.jpg

659 ms

why-us.jpg

why-us.jpg

869 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

1133 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

596 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

832 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

836 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

839 ms

owl.animate.js

owl.animate.js

1037 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

1075 ms

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

1075 ms

ResponsiveAccordianMenu.js

ResponsiveAccordianMenu.js

1082 ms

default.js

default.js

1083 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

14 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

26 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

33 ms

init.js

init.js

33 ms

Accessibility Review

indiatool.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

indiatool.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

indiatool.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indiatool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indiatool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indiatool.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indiatool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: