3.4 sec in total
918 ms
2.4 sec
66 ms
Visit indigoview.com now to see the best up-to-date Indigo View content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indigoview.com
Indigo View is an award-winning production company working across Films & TV Series, Advertising & Corporate Videos, Hotel & Tourism, Animation & Post Production and Production Services. | www.indigov...
Visit indigoview.comWe analyzed Indigoview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 918 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
indigoview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
918 ms
44 ms
44 ms
80 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Indigoview.com, 44% (35 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 21% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 657.9 kB (51%)
1.3 MB
642.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Indigoview.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 570.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 438.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 438.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indigo View needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 192.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 192.0 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (30%)
61
43
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigo View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.indigoview.com
918 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
44 ms
minified.js
44 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
80 ms
polyfill.min.js
43 ms
uc.js
170 ms
widget.js
72 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
collect
25 ms
0fbb11_60d164a11c3e44608d0c8a11a992170bf000.jpg
330 ms
229341_a3f9de06d42942d2b5e7dcfe9ec87357~mv2.png
439 ms
229341_56113a797bd748e6891bc1e0029096b1~mv2.png
322 ms
4b9ac2a8513d4218b4e7211e83b1bdbd.jpg
188 ms
229341_3611631c8fdb4c37b85ae36bcce32b50~mv2.png
322 ms
229341_193db9643fe44c84923d8ba542875258~mv2.jpeg
303 ms
229341_f49c2925069543d8b026a17d481fc796~mv2.png
473 ms
229341_75c9a47597b44c758be0bdf8b7874389~mv2.jpg
528 ms
229341_2ee42c5c3cb94f9594a53432ddc5a40d~mv2.jpg
498 ms
229341_7ca9cc854dd24d22b6cf86e7664ed962~mv2.jpg
627 ms
0fbb11_8006ac3967fd4181af27fde27117ce77~mv2.png
490 ms
greekfixerswhite.png
626 ms
file.woff
552 ms
file.woff
589 ms
file.woff
588 ms
229341_d1a9669eb5b44564b6bf6e12eb808633~mv2.jpg
753 ms
229341_88fc73013a444e8099fefefd153fd316~mv2.jpg
799 ms
229341_0274bfb9bdd74708bc43a7698578cd6f~mv2.jpg
793 ms
229341_a49bd4f463744702862eec53e565ade8~mv2.jpg
795 ms
229341_e7f08e1ec9a649a8b52160c89b494558~mv2.jpg
809 ms
229341_e141b02ca75844e1989779151d432024~mv2.jpg
777 ms
229341_4b033af4dd8e4233b44b11c36c82ebe8~mv2.jpg
1009 ms
229341_d5af835d7fbe4a5c82c882a3eb9fa4c7~mv2.jpg
1057 ms
229341_e6b9c1370cc844b1826eed0f8755cec8~mv2.jpg
1025 ms
229341_c0ed4231e03e47d4a606f8e70e0c9852~mv2.jpg
1039 ms
229341_e656975afc0942fba9deb461880da12b~mv2.jpg
1056 ms
229341_a0251b3c33b44fd585bd57a61824cf73~mv2.png
982 ms
229341_436b7da64d0e4e148963ae7832e9d312~mv2.jpg
1167 ms
0fbb11_cdab060007a44b32ae2050bccfa5614f~mv2.png
1193 ms
0fbb11_b0034aa6f49643fdb0e4eb3a4653070a~mv2.jpg
1177 ms
crientlogos2022_edited.jpg
1205 ms
0fbb11_c56c96624b604a0f9619a951605464e0~mv2.jpg
1197 ms
0fbb11_f64dc90f74f84ae3a3fdb7c59619dba5~mv2.png
1194 ms
2e-bannerespaE%C3%86%C3%85%C3%87460X60.png
1300 ms
229341_74fce042919c40cab30b46eb7953e68a~mv2.png
1407 ms
bundle.min.js
16 ms
128 ms
128 ms
127 ms
125 ms
124 ms
125 ms
thunderbolt-commons.01a1d4ab.bundle.min.js
62 ms
122 ms
main.7ae9ac9b.bundle.min.js
62 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
60 ms
lodash.min.js
62 ms
react.production.min.js
62 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
64 ms
56 ms
94 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
45 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
48 ms
87 ms
67 ms
56 ms
widget_app_base_1716562046528.js
177 ms
AifY1lFH6o
333 ms
en-US.json
8 ms
remediation_1716562046528.js
30 ms
KCOIf8T0smH39A1j.json
68 ms
body_wh.svg
18 ms
spin_wh.svg
20 ms
remediation-tool.js
10 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
7 ms
bolt-performance
18 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
12 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
5 ms
indigoview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
indigoview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
indigoview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigoview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigoview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indigoview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indigo View. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: