Tools & Wizards About Us
industrialelectrictesting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

industrialelectrictesting.com

Electrical Testing | Jacksonville, FL | Industrial Electric Testing, Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

965 ms

Page Rendered

361 ms

industrialelectrictesting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to industrialelectrictesting.com homepage info - get ready to check Industrial Electric Testing best content right away, or after learning these important things about industrialelectrictesting.com

Need electrical testing? New installation or an electrical maintenance check, call Industrial Electric Testing, Inc. in Jacksonville, FL, NETA Accredited.

Visit industrialelectrictesting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Industrialelectrictesting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

industrialelectrictesting.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

industrialelectrictesting.com

42 ms

www.industrialelectrictesting.com

90 ms

image004-1920w.jpg

106 ms

jquery.min.js

33 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Industrialelectrictesting.com, 54% (7 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 15% (2 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) relates to the external source Mpactions.superpages.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.6 kB (36%)

Content Size

316.6 kB

After Optimization

203.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Industrialelectrictesting.com main page is 316.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 162.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 94.2 kB

  • Original 153.4 kB
  • After minification 149.6 kB
  • After compression 59.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 76 B

  • Original 515 B
  • After minification 439 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Industrial Electric Testing needs image optimization as it can save up to 76 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 162.7 kB
  • After minification 162.7 kB
  • After compression 143.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Industrial Electric Testing. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

industrialelectrictesting.com

industrialelectrictesting.com

42 ms

www.industrialelectrictesting.com

www.industrialelectrictesting.com

90 ms

image004-1920w.jpg

image004-1920w.jpg

106 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

48 ms

dxmscript.min.js

dxmscript.min.js

831 ms

image004-225w.jpg

image004-225w.jpg

120 ms

Phone-Icon-White-1920w.png

Phone-Icon-White-1920w.png

113 ms

163340819-1920w.jpg

163340819-1920w.jpg

275 ms

1306097599-698w.jpg

1306097599-698w.jpg

117 ms

1306097599-720w.jpg

1306097599-720w.jpg

120 ms

461253101-1920w.jpg

461253101-1920w.jpg

274 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

24 ms

Accessibility Review

industrialelectrictesting.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

industrialelectrictesting.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

industrialelectrictesting.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Industrialelectrictesting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Industrialelectrictesting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

industrialelectrictesting.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Industrial Electric Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: