2.2 sec in total
352 ms
1.3 sec
556 ms
Click here to check amazing Inexpensivelogo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inexpensivelogo.com
We specialize in comprehensive logo design services for visual identification of companies, institutions, products and events.
Visit inexpensivelogo.comWe analyzed Inexpensivelogo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
inexpensivelogo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.096
91/100
15%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
352 ms
15 ms
44 ms
44 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Inexpensivelogo.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (457 ms) belongs to the original domain Inexpensivelogo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 487.4 kB (53%)
913.3 kB
426.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Inexpensivelogo.com main page is 913.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 448.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inexpensivelogo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 318.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inexpensivelogo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (42%)
91
53
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inexpensivelogo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inexpensivelogo.com
352 ms
ga.js
15 ms
css
44 ms
css
44 ms
style.css
57 ms
custom.css
44 ms
lightbox.css
56 ms
media-queries.css
55 ms
settings.css
56 ms
captions.php
237 ms
jquery.js
105 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
modernizr.js
94 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
115 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
94 ms
js
49 ms
lightbox.js
94 ms
gmap3.min.js
108 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
110 ms
functions.js
114 ms
jquery.tweet.js
118 ms
easing.js
129 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
128 ms
jquery.cookie.js
130 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
collect
60 ms
style.css
108 ms
prefixfree.min.js
406 ms
close.png
36 ms
loading.gif
38 ms
prev.png
38 ms
next.png
38 ms
patern5.png
87 ms
bullet_arrow_social.png
89 ms
twitter.png
89 ms
facebook.png
90 ms
linkedin.png
91 ms
logo.png
457 ms
Logo.png
95 ms
Banner13.png
345 ms
port36-220x164.jpg
96 ms
port36-290x200.jpg
96 ms
port35-220x164.jpg
97 ms
port35-290x200.jpg
321 ms
port34-220x164.jpg
341 ms
port34-290x200.jpg
342 ms
port33-220x164.jpg
345 ms
port33-290x200.jpg
345 ms
port32-220x164.jpg
348 ms
port32-290x200.jpg
345 ms
port31-220x164.jpg
349 ms
port31-290x200.jpg
349 ms
port30-220x164.jpg
352 ms
port30-290x200.jpg
352 ms
port29-220x164.jpg
353 ms
port29-290x200.jpg
353 ms
port28-220x164.jpg
354 ms
port28-290x200.jpg
356 ms
port27-220x164.jpg
355 ms
port27-290x200.jpg
357 ms
port26-220x164.jpg
360 ms
port26-290x200.jpg
361 ms
port25-220x164.jpg
338 ms
port25-290x200.jpg
333 ms
port24-220x164.jpg
334 ms
port24-290x200.jpg
334 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
54 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
55 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
54 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
56 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xL_Y9QCc4uCqq1xfpYavBoU.ttf
55 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xOFz6Gj96EQO4nYTex8Y8wM.ttf
55 ms
port1-220x164.jpg
332 ms
port1-290x200.jpg
284 ms
Jennys-Boutique-2-220x164.jpg
283 ms
Jennys-Boutique-2-290x200.jpg
283 ms
port2-220x164.jpg
283 ms
port2-290x200.jpg
282 ms
circle.png
278 ms
time.png
279 ms
beautifuldesign.png
277 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
245 ms
cheapnpros.png
276 ms
count.js
230 ms
100peroriginal.png
102 ms
unlimitedrevisions.png
101 ms
allformats.png
101 ms
righttoemail.png
100 ms
Cheapnprofessional.png
100 ms
one.png
100 ms
two.png
99 ms
three.png
98 ms
quote.png
99 ms
enlarge.png
99 ms
open.png
97 ms
responsive_on_demand.png
99 ms
headings_top_shadow.png
98 ms
timer.png
98 ms
shadow1.png
98 ms
bullet.png
97 ms
slider_previous_arrow.png
100 ms
slider_next_arrow.png
99 ms
inexpensivelogo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
inexpensivelogo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
inexpensivelogo.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inexpensivelogo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inexpensivelogo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inexpensivelogo.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inexpensivelogo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: