Tools & Wizards About Us
infodoc.it screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

infodoc.it

Infodoc - Servizi di informazione tecnica, Mirandola, Modena

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

390 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

infodoc.it screenshot

About Website

Visit infodoc.it now to see the best up-to-date Infodoc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about infodoc.it

INFODOC la prima struttura in Italia nata con il preciso obiettivo di offrire un servizio professionale di ricerca, acquisizione e fornitura on-demand di norme e pubblicazioni tecniche da tutto il mon...

Visit infodoc.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Infodoc.it page load time and found that the first response time was 390 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infodoc.it performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.677

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infodoc.it

390 ms

www.infodoc.it

2797 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

100 ms

style.min.css

200 ms

font_awesome.css

295 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Infodoc.it, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Infodoc.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 252.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infodoc.it main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 863.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 90.2 kB

  • Original 109.3 kB
  • After minification 105.2 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

  • Original 863.7 kB
  • After minification 795.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infodoc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 90.3 kB

  • Original 604.4 kB
  • After minification 604.4 kB
  • After compression 514.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 89.0 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 84.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infodoc.it has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (69%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infodoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

infodoc.it

infodoc.it

390 ms

www.infodoc.it

www.infodoc.it

2797 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

100 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

200 ms

font_awesome.css

font_awesome.css

295 ms

styles.css

styles.css

296 ms

email-subscribers-public.css

email-subscribers-public.css

293 ms

front-legacy.css

front-legacy.css

297 ms

slick.css

slick.css

296 ms

wpls-public.css

wpls-public.css

297 ms

public.css

public.css

390 ms

style.css

style.css

391 ms

style.css

style.css

392 ms

bellows.min.css

bellows.min.css

392 ms

css

css

43 ms

robojob.css

robojob.css

600 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

406 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

629 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

493 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

accordion.js

accordion.js

491 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

36 ms

demo.css

demo.css

492 ms

css

css

59 ms

js

js

83 ms

uc.js

uc.js

39 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

502 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

587 ms

index.js

index.js

588 ms

email-subscribers-public.js

email-subscribers-public.js

588 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

622 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

764 ms

robojob.min.js

robojob.min.js

887 ms

app.js

app.js

764 ms

bellows.min.js

bellows.min.js

764 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

764 ms

v4-shims.js

v4-shims.js

53 ms

all.js

all.js

91 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

764 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

784 ms

wpls-public.js

wpls-public.js

796 ms

logo_infodoc_servizi_di_informazione_tecnica.png

logo_infodoc_servizi_di_informazione_tecnica.png

121 ms

bg_homepage.jpg

bg_homepage.jpg

697 ms

logo_infodoc_40anni_blu_sfondo_bianco-150x150.png

logo_infodoc_40anni_blu_sfondo_bianco-150x150.png

147 ms

Distributor_Horizontal_RGB_small.gif

Distributor_Horizontal_RGB_small.gif

205 ms

techstreet_new_logo_232x113.jpg

techstreet_new_logo_232x113.jpg

330 ms

SAE_Logo.gif

SAE_Logo.gif

329 ms

LOGOCEI_senza_scritta-1.gif

LOGOCEI_senza_scritta-1.gif

339 ms

Logo-Transparent-e1630514493680.png

Logo-Transparent-e1630514493680.png

537 ms

ASME_Logo_small-1.gif

ASME_Logo_small-1.gif

339 ms

TPP_Small.jpg

TPP_Small.jpg

340 ms

AIPnD_socio_2024.png

AIPnD_socio_2024.png

795 ms

pattern_3.png

pattern_3.png

342 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

697 ms

logo-footer-completo.png

logo-footer-completo.png

408 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

17 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

533 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

602 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff

23 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff

44 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff

58 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff

58 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff

58 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

310 ms

Accessibility Review

infodoc.it accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

infodoc.it best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

infodoc.it SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infodoc.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Infodoc.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infodoc.it

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infodoc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: