4.4 sec in total
298 ms
3.4 sec
739 ms
Visit infoplum.com now to see the best up-to-date Infoplum content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about infoplum.com
壹牛企業(www.infoplum.com)91麻豆精品国产91久久久久久影視,一级爱做片免费观看久久提供欧美久久久精品中文字幕免費播放以及中文字幕无码久久精品免费在線觀賞等最新影片內容視頻網站!
Visit infoplum.comWe analyzed Infoplum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
infoplum.com performance score
298 ms
47 ms
180 ms
178 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 130 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Infoplum.com, 7% (9 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Infoplum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (61%)
4.8 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Infoplum.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infoplum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infoplum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (58%)
113
47
The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infoplum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.infoplum.com
298 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
47 ms
styles.css
180 ms
site.min.css
178 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
179 ms
style.css
326 ms
style.css
180 ms
responsive.css
188 ms
responsive.css
250 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
252 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
250 ms
rgs.css
262 ms
font-awesome.min.css
269 ms
style.css
354 ms
prettyPhoto.css
354 ms
responsive.css
400 ms
ascend.css
968 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
355 ms
animations.min.css
397 ms
frontend.min.css
403 ms
global.css
396 ms
post-4391.css
422 ms
js_composer.min.css
476 ms
jquery.js
547 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
474 ms
modernizr.js
478 ms
ProgressCircle.min.js
500 ms
jquery.vc_chart.min.js
549 ms
css
107 ms
css
89 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
461 ms
core.min.js
456 ms
widget.min.js
483 ms
position.min.js
530 ms
menu.min.js
531 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
530 ms
autocomplete.min.js
531 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
558 ms
jquery.form.min.js
606 ms
api.js
96 ms
scripts.js
606 ms
nicescroll.js
606 ms
prettyPhoto.js
536 ms
superfish.js
561 ms
init.js
993 ms
infinitescroll.js
667 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
615 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
567 ms
nectar-slider.js
680 ms
site.min.js
635 ms
wp-embed.min.js
665 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
586 ms
slick.min.js
814 ms
waypoints.min.js
813 ms
frontend.min.js
812 ms
l.js
183 ms
ga.js
138 ms
VqpP7pEO18s
352 ms
Infoplum_RGB_Tagline_HHH_New.png
193 ms
iStock_000062458206_Double-1024x512.jpg
769 ms
Image-15-_-London-Games-Explorer.jpg
324 ms
sports-data-infoplum.jpg
323 ms
sports-statistics-infoplum.jpg
266 ms
AFL.png
769 ms
Basketball.png
323 ms
Cricket.png
323 ms
Cycling.png
769 ms
Football.png
769 ms
Netball.png
769 ms
Judo.png
768 ms
Golf.png
811 ms
Rugby-League.png
809 ms
Tennis.png
810 ms
Roar_Logo_RGB.png
809 ms
Cricket-Australia.png
988 ms
Conmebol.png
1456 ms
Commonwealth.png
986 ms
Apple-Daily.png
1030 ms
Luftansa.png
987 ms
nordnet.png
988 ms
ABC-Australia.png
989 ms
AFP.png
989 ms
EL-PAIS.png
989 ms
LCL.png
1031 ms
KFC.png
1031 ms
Interact-Sport.png
1031 ms
France-24.png
1032 ms
Fairfax.png
1192 ms
Radio-Newzeland.png
1192 ms
2641902.js
154 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1044 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1046 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1047 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1249 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
88 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
112 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
148 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
187 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
186 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
186 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1322 ms
__utm.gif
51 ms
client.js
70 ms
client_legacy.css
84 ms
icomoon.woff
988 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
191 ms
www-embed-player.js
190 ms
base.js
190 ms
VqpP7pEO18s
0 ms
recaptcha__en.js
91 ms
iStock_000041456924_Large.jpg
809 ms
grid.png
525 ms
iStock_000048186820_XXXLarge.jpg
747 ms
iStock_000056351192_Large.jpg
847 ms
1814-1-e1500528709864.jpg
1031 ms
VqpP7pEO18s
109 ms
iStock_000058821928_Double.jpg
862 ms
diagonal_line.png
717 ms
ajax-loader.gif
811 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
8 ms
www-embed-player.js
18 ms
base.js
27 ms
id
101 ms
2tj_Yt5eAEN1YazL-za5nq2m-sVEuK50_GPDTIKqlPM.js
61 ms
ad_status.js
107 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
50 ms
__ptq.gif
68 ms
2641902.js
87 ms
2641902.js
63 ms
collectedforms.js
41 ms
infoplum.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infoplum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Infoplum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infoplum.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infoplum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: