4.8 sec in total
92 ms
4.4 sec
355 ms
Visit inmar.com now to see the best up-to-date Inmar content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inmar.com
Inmar Intelligence leverages data science and technology to power reliable, dynamic solutions for brands, retailers, and healthcare organizations — including incentives and loyalty, media, returns, an...
Visit inmar.comWe analyzed Inmar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
inmar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
92 ms
1806 ms
232 ms
1339 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Inmar.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Inmar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (56%)
1.8 MB
803.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Inmar.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 770.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 35.5 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inmar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 519.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 519.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 385.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inmar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 385.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (57%)
76
33
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inmar.com
92 ms
www.inmar.com
1806 ms
www.inmar.com
232 ms
Home.aspx
1339 ms
controls.css
92 ms
digitalcounter.css
108 ms
page-layouts-21.css
136 ms
rca.css
134 ms
search.css
143 ms
corev4.css
261 ms
styles.css
238 ms
satelliteLib-f3055b782b08fdd876e427275fce39811df13338.js
88 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
214 ms
jquery.query.js
171 ms
jquery.cycle.js
209 ms
jquery.corner.js
180 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
209 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
224 ms
jquery.tn3.min.js
291 ms
tn3.facebook.min.js
256 ms
tn3.flickr.min.js
247 ms
tn3.history.min.js
271 ms
tn3.picasa.min.js
272 ms
master_top.js
271 ms
jQuery.equalHeights.js
306 ms
WebResource.axd
304 ms
WebResource.axd
308 ms
flipcounter.min.js
288 ms
blank.js
320 ms
prettyPhoto.css
309 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
320 ms
BrightcoveExperiences.js
34 ms
master_bottom.js
317 ms
munchkin.js
35 ms
css
57 ms
function-pro.css
121 ms
init.js
54 ms
ScriptResource.axd
96 ms
ScriptResource.axd
64 ms
ScriptResource.axd
33 ms
ScriptResource.axd
81 ms
ScriptResource.axd
66 ms
ScriptResource.axd
67 ms
back_tile_002.gif
74 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
bgximg.png
82 ms
search_icon.gif
82 ms
gosearch15.png
61 ms
inmar_logo.gif
81 ms
fgimg.png
81 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
111 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
112 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
229 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
229 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
229 ms
FunctionPro-Book-webfont.woff
82 ms
digitalcouponband-1-bbs-places.png
81 ms
dollarsign.png
225 ms
Homepage-Slider-Slides-5.jpg
235 ms
Homepage-Slider-Slides-1.jpg
235 ms
Homepage-Slider-Slides-2.jpg
230 ms
Homepage-Slider-Slides-3.jpg
228 ms
Homepage-Slider-Slides-4.jpg
235 ms
right.png
231 ms
left.png
234 ms
forum2016_web.jpg
284 ms
Digital-Health-Challenge-Video.png
284 ms
rss_icon.gif
283 ms
awards-pre-footer.gif
285 ms
inmar_footer.gif
284 ms
homepage_mask.png
280 ms
upgrade_flash_player2.gif
41 ms
thoughtleadershipbanner.jpg
236 ms
WebResource.axd
229 ms
shadowcurve_vertical.png
228 ms
linkid.js
122 ms
munchkin.js
72 ms
60287.js
204 ms
tracker.php
126 ms
satellite-5697c84064746d6f1c00027b.html
74 ms
digits_small.png
82 ms
dpx.js
65 ms
collect
31 ms
visitWebPage
46 ms
p
5 ms
dpx
8 ms
match_redirect
21 ms
inmar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
inmar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
inmar.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inmar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inmar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inmar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inmar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: