22.7 sec in total
259 ms
21.9 sec
523 ms
Click here to check amazing Innogage content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about innogage.com
Connecting businesses to their clients using new technologies - Innogage Digital Marketing
Visit innogage.comWe analyzed Innogage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 22.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
innogage.com performance score
259 ms
442 ms
272 ms
1000 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Innogage.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Innogage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 341.7 kB (13%)
2.6 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Innogage.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Innogage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 107.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innogage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (59%)
73
30
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Innogage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
innogage.com
259 ms
www.innogage.com
442 ms
formidablepro.css
272 ms
style-gc-message-bar.php
1000 ms
css
138 ms
postpromo.css
921 ms
author-page.css
1223 ms
dynamic-to-top-css.php
1911 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
220 ms
jquery.cake.js
1868 ms
jquery.easing.js
2245 ms
swfobject.js
3572 ms
wp-plus-one.js
2899 ms
widgets.js
1434 ms
external-tracking.min.js
3268 ms
plusone.js
802 ms
recaptcha.css
3569 ms
wpp.css
3894 ms
base.css
4231 ms
skeleton.css
4556 ms
comments.css
4888 ms
buttons.css
5531 ms
ui.totop.css
5260 ms
superfish.css
5874 ms
flexslider.css
6177 ms
chosen.css
6531 ms
prettyPhoto.css
6875 ms
styles.css
7350 ms
typography-sans.css
7569 ms
style.css
7862 ms
tabs.js
8188 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
8567 ms
filterable.pack.js
8872 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
9328 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.js
9949 ms
superfish.js
9878 ms
supersubs.js
10191 ms
chosen.jquery.js
10586 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
10848 ms
skeleton-key.js
11262 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
11913 ms
jquery.easing.js
11844 ms
dynamic.to.top.min.js
11936 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
82 ms
ga.js
274 ms
innogage-brand-23-362x73PNG.png
8700 ms
Innogage-digital-marketing-r.jpg
9301 ms
innoblogs-business-blogging-software-r.jpg
9761 ms
CMArotator.jpg
10929 ms
digital-marketing-agency-columbus-r.jpg
10927 ms
responsive-website-design-awesome-r.jpg
10567 ms
business-blogging-software-innoblogs.jpg
10864 ms
columbus-digital-agency.jpg
11016 ms
innogage-partners.jpg
11359 ms
Phone-To-Action.jpg
11819 ms
ask-questions.png
12033 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
selfishy-blog.jpg
12047 ms
INNOGAGEBGherribone-crop-1500x1266.jpg
13788 ms
google_plus_32.png
12010 ms
twitter_32.png
11955 ms
facebook_32.png
12042 ms
vimeo_32.png
11965 ms
linkedin_32.png
11997 ms
rss_32.png
11988 ms
163210.js
232 ms
uparrow.png
10955 ms
slide-shadow.png
11425 ms
img-bg-pat.png
11685 ms
post_link.png
11903 ms
pop_link.png
12000 ms
chosen-sprite.png
8230 ms
flexslider_control_nav.png
8588 ms
flexslider_direction_nav.png
8896 ms
tracker.js
61 ms
innogage.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innogage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innogage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
innogage.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Innogage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: