5.6 sec in total
332 ms
5 sec
253 ms
Welcome to inode64.com homepage info - get ready to check INODE64 best content right away, or after learning these important things about inode64.com
Informática Castellón, Hardware Castellón, Reparación informatica, Mac Castellon, Servidores Linux, desarrollo de portales web en Joomla,tiendas e-commerce,hosting y dominios, servidores dedicados, po...
Visit inode64.comWe analyzed Inode64.com page load time and found that the first response time was 332 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
inode64.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.147
77/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
332 ms
2658 ms
118 ms
219 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Inode64.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Inode64.com.
Page size can be reduced by 240.9 kB (38%)
636.0 kB
395.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Inode64.com main page is 636.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 444.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INODE64 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.8 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inode64.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 57% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)
59
26
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INODE64. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inode64.com
332 ms
www.inode64.com
2658 ms
k2-21c9b78a.css
118 ms
highlight.css
219 ms
modal-cb6382e8.css
195 ms
widgetkit-459623c9-e83932b9.css
209 ms
jcemediabox.css
248 ms
style.css
249 ms
vmsite-ltr.css
210 ms
mootools-core-3ac2a0d5.js
380 ms
core-a5b5a4d5.js
318 ms
k2.js
363 ms
caption-7457f705.js
319 ms
highlight.js
363 ms
mootools-more-dcafec0a.js
581 ms
modal-fcd71e95.js
422 ms
jquery-172f490d.js
512 ms
widgetkit-3a93eed1-0208da27.js
461 ms
jcemediabox.js
555 ms
template-819d79ca.css
472 ms
template-40e37b38.js
514 ms
sh404sefsocial.js
696 ms
search.js
699 ms
in.js
20 ms
widgets.js
50 ms
lightbox.js
199 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
186 ms
spotlight.js
319 ms
ga.js
9 ms
logo-cuadrado_normal.jpg
66 ms
flickr.png
296 ms
linkedin.png
295 ms
twitter.png
296 ms
google_plus.png
295 ms
youtube.png
297 ms
skype.png
339 ms
all.js
60 ms
logo.png
337 ms
__utm.gif
94 ms
email.png
278 ms
all.js
230 ms
feed.png
187 ms
plusone.js
118 ms
widgets.js
77 ms
plusone.js
70 ms
popup.html
140 ms
tooltip.html
139 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
208 ms
close.png
144 ms
blank.gif
144 ms
99 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
55 ms
fastbutton
51 ms
postmessageRelay
111 ms
settings
94 ms
developers.google.com
768 ms
1832714284-postmessagerelay.js
42 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
25 ms
button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
embeds
45 ms
tweet_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.es.html
40 ms
inode64.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
inode64.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
inode64.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inode64.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inode64.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inode64.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INODE64. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: