Tools & Wizards About Us
instagiffer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

instagiffer.com

Instagiffer GIF Maker - From Video To GIF (Mac and PC)

Page Load Speed

883 ms in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

529 ms

Page Rendered

232 ms

instagiffer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit instagiffer.com now to see the best up-to-date Instagiffer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about instagiffer.com

Since 2013, Instagiffer has been helping thousands of people create animated GIFs from YouTube, HD video files, Vine, Netflix, Kodi, game streams, and more. Unlike most GIF tools, you can open video.....

Visit instagiffer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Instagiffer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 761 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

instagiffer.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

instagiffer.com

122 ms

pre_tumblelog.js

63 ms

index.build.css

60 ms

reset.css

69 ms

bilmur.min.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Instagiffer.com, 24% (13 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to I58.tinypic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (202 ms) relates to the external source Ssl.google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.7 kB (69%)

Content Size

170.2 kB

After Optimization

53.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Instagiffer.com main page is 170.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 140.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 115.1 kB

  • Original 140.3 kB
  • After minification 122.8 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 513 B

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Instagiffer needs image optimization as it can save up to 513 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 40 B

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instagiffer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (68%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instagiffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

instagiffer.com

instagiffer.com

122 ms

pre_tumblelog.js

pre_tumblelog.js

63 ms

index.build.css

index.build.css

60 ms

reset.css

reset.css

69 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

60 ms

tumblelog_post_message_queue.js

tumblelog_post_message_queue.js

60 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

65 ms

slim-10_7.css

slim-10_7.css

76 ms

tweets.js

tweets.js

46 ms

index.build.js

index.build.js

95 ms

all.js

all.js

168 ms

avatar_2f5a871f0b83_64.pnj

avatar_2f5a871f0b83_64.pnj

166 ms

9ka2r7.gif

9ka2r7.gif

132 ms

30mmqf8.jpg

30mmqf8.jpg

132 ms

256g55w.jpg

256g55w.jpg

131 ms

24o0mfm.jpg

24o0mfm.jpg

145 ms

fjp8p4.jpg

fjp8p4.jpg

131 ms

33fffqs.gif

33fffqs.gif

130 ms

rsu7er.gif

rsu7er.gif

131 ms

33o79tu.gif

33o79tu.gif

130 ms

whef0w.png

whef0w.png

130 ms

sf9hr7.jpg

sf9hr7.jpg

130 ms

25rpapf.png

25rpapf.png

130 ms

2ezk2z4.png

2ezk2z4.png

143 ms

2412e0k.png

2412e0k.png

144 ms

anonymous_avatar_24.gif

anonymous_avatar_24.gif

130 ms

dffzhd.gif

dffzhd.gif

129 ms

1zzric2.gif

1zzric2.gif

129 ms

nd97ch.gif

nd97ch.gif

128 ms

avatar_27bdf2686ac0_24.pnj

avatar_27bdf2686ac0_24.pnj

163 ms

95pt89.gif

95pt89.gif

128 ms

4g12iw.gif

4g12iw.gif

129 ms

oh71hj.jpg

oh71hj.jpg

128 ms

53v504.png

53v504.png

128 ms

bi0wt5.jpg

bi0wt5.jpg

128 ms

icons_sprite.png

icons_sprite.png

127 ms

like_iframe.html

like_iframe.html

124 ms

ga.js

ga.js

202 ms

impixu

impixu

184 ms

impixu

impixu

184 ms

arrow_sprite.png

arrow_sprite.png

129 ms

g.gif

g.gif

134 ms

analytics.html

analytics.html

42 ms

login_check.html

login_check.html

33 ms

consent

consent

85 ms

all.js

all.js

38 ms

tumblr_inline_net7b8Uq5L1s0schj.gif

tumblr_inline_net7b8Uq5L1s0schj.gif

79 ms

66 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

24 ms

header.build.js

header.build.js

4 ms

exceptions.js

exceptions.js

6 ms

index.build.js

index.build.js

12 ms

cs.js

cs.js

8 ms

cdn.json

cdn.json

6 ms

g.gif

g.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

instagiffer.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

instagiffer.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

instagiffer.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instagiffer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Instagiffer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

instagiffer.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Instagiffer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: