3.3 sec in total
599 ms
2.4 sec
241 ms
Visit instakeeper.com now to see the best up-to-date Instakeeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about instakeeper.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit instakeeper.comWe analyzed Instakeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 599 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
instakeeper.com performance score
599 ms
173 ms
173 ms
180 ms
240 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Instakeeper.com, 22% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (769 ms) belongs to the original domain Instakeeper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 464.0 kB (51%)
918.6 kB
454.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Instakeeper.com main page is 918.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 418.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Instakeeper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 295.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instakeeper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (74%)
46
12
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instakeeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
instakeeper.com
599 ms
tablet.css
173 ms
normalize.css
173 ms
layout.css
180 ms
joomla.css
240 ms
system.css
172 ms
template.css
245 ms
menu.css
311 ms
gk.stuff.css
295 ms
style1.css
307 ms
typography.style1.css
318 ms
typography.iconset.style1.css
370 ms
css
24 ms
mootools-core.js
577 ms
core.js
419 ms
caption.js
434 ms
mootools-more.js
769 ms
gk.scripts.js
455 ms
gk.menu.js
498 ms
moo.masonry.js
547 ms
widgets.js
85 ms
pinit.js
8 ms
PinExt.png
81 ms
page-bg-4.png
160 ms
logo.png
217 ms
instakeeper-get.png
610 ms
toplink.png
159 ms
plusone.js
104 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
197 ms
f8OBjBbevvywgbyJOxlO7Q.ttf
10 ms
pinit_main.js
135 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
13 ms
fastbutton
95 ms
sharebutton
193 ms
postmessageRelay
107 ms
count.json
158 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
29 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
36 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
87 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
87 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
167 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
61 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en-gb.html
54 ms
rs=AGLTcCPeW_yxohM6d2vzOu9_v18SNdO9Aw
65 ms
rs=AGLTcCOhiTjGg0lKd7KYO2ITWjb6KAG_Tw
14 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
jot
96 ms
mobile.css
127 ms
all.js
268 ms
instakeeper.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instakeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Instakeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
instakeeper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Instakeeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: