Tools & Wizards About Us
instrument-msk.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

instrument-msk.ru

Главная

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

886 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

instrument-msk.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Instrument Msk content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about instrument-msk.ru

Интернет-магазин электроинструмента Dewalt

Visit instrument-msk.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Instrument-msk.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 886 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

instrument-msk.ru performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

instrument-msk.ru

886 ms

default_298526b42f3b57b169a4bbbf4adf32c1_v1.css

276 ms

default_e9c869daf9bbd1b208ba25ff7d317d23_v1.css

281 ms

template_1d1ffe8833ef63c6bf1d66f74bb035a9_v1.css

564 ms

popup.min.css

278 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Instrument-msk.ru and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Instrument-msk.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 506.1 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Instrument-msk.ru main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 830.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 222.9 kB

  • Original 258.7 kB
  • After minification 202.2 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 56.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 222.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 830.3 kB
  • After minification 826.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Instrument Msk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 376.3 kB
  • After minification 376.1 kB
  • After compression 358.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 262.3 kB

  • Original 326.5 kB
  • After minification 311.6 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instrument-msk.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 262.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (43%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instrument Msk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

instrument-msk.ru

instrument-msk.ru

886 ms

default_298526b42f3b57b169a4bbbf4adf32c1_v1.css

default_298526b42f3b57b169a4bbbf4adf32c1_v1.css

276 ms

default_e9c869daf9bbd1b208ba25ff7d317d23_v1.css

default_e9c869daf9bbd1b208ba25ff7d317d23_v1.css

281 ms

template_1d1ffe8833ef63c6bf1d66f74bb035a9_v1.css

template_1d1ffe8833ef63c6bf1d66f74bb035a9_v1.css

564 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

278 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

562 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

kernel_main_v1.js

431 ms

protobuf.min.js

protobuf.min.js

555 ms

model.min.js

model.min.js

416 ms

core_promise.min.js

core_promise.min.js

421 ms

rest.client.min.js

rest.client.min.js

554 ms

pull.client.min.js

pull.client.min.js

599 ms

ajax.min.js

ajax.min.js

601 ms

core_ls.min.js

core_ls.min.js

693 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

702 ms

speed.min.js

speed.min.js

699 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

701 ms

ls.unveilhooks.min.js

ls.unveilhooks.min.js

714 ms

template_f15b9b7e51bcaa583289cccfb8c40c82_v1.js

template_f15b9b7e51bcaa583289cccfb8c40c82_v1.js

1164 ms

default_0f97c5c3198215075f4c9d165f78bb4d_v1.js

default_0f97c5c3198215075f4c9d165f78bb4d_v1.js

830 ms

default_79cf4acef1040fa37fdcfd1ed6691535_v1.js

default_79cf4acef1040fa37fdcfd1ed6691535_v1.js

835 ms

setTheme.php

setTheme.php

1896 ms

u7u515dz20xub2t904shs3jiuujgoe8w.png

u7u515dz20xub2t904shs3jiuujgoe8w.png

142 ms

y812q0uhp285y88ypgt7tkl034fjuu5t.png

y812q0uhp285y88ypgt7tkl034fjuu5t.png

139 ms

ps2h2vrmqc9ad1wp4q9yr8fshn2ggb56.png

ps2h2vrmqc9ad1wp4q9yr8fshn2ggb56.png

141 ms

35zubiclhz748jxcmks4evvim0mdz9wu.png

35zubiclhz748jxcmks4evvim0mdz9wu.png

143 ms

8t7jkq9y8ilmeh93r3gw1kmpefa0gv2k.png

8t7jkq9y8ilmeh93r3gw1kmpefa0gv2k.png

139 ms

hqvdr2f1zi3imudak11p8q4brzgzgkho.png

hqvdr2f1zi3imudak11p8q4brzgzgkho.png

276 ms

1vr3usvpm9l6nfjuolylgr8s06xdbd5k.png

1vr3usvpm9l6nfjuolylgr8s06xdbd5k.png

277 ms

jqb56k02hmnil6pmb820roksjetto7he.png

jqb56k02hmnil6pmb820roksjetto7he.png

277 ms

mpnlkn0bwblqkfxpy14ae1nroi22dnkk.png

mpnlkn0bwblqkfxpy14ae1nroi22dnkk.png

284 ms

37lghj16xpgui4ynl4ndvc6lwvbk8og6.png

37lghj16xpgui4ynl4ndvc6lwvbk8og6.png

284 ms

arrows.svg

arrows.svg

144 ms

header_icons.svg

header_icons.svg

139 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

139 ms

9wzphkndgm1c5agzexqf3ri79m2m6h3p.jpg

9wzphkndgm1c5agzexqf3ri79m2m6h3p.jpg

143 ms

item_icons.svg

item_icons.svg

141 ms

double_ring.svg

double_ring.svg

139 ms

social.svg

social.svg

354 ms

payment.svg

payment.svg

367 ms

panel_icons.svg

panel_icons.svg

198 ms

sjf4kgvq7hbmya0qmyrd5m4s3whrx9ne.jpg

sjf4kgvq7hbmya0qmyrd5m4s3whrx9ne.jpg

630 ms

j8q1v1j6a4u3ng29rkbldy6go3bq9ula.jpg

j8q1v1j6a4u3ng29rkbldy6go3bq9ula.jpg

359 ms

u0vgh4xq2cgr6op6m0ru6oo5g0heprlu.jpg

u0vgh4xq2cgr6op6m0ru6oo5g0heprlu.jpg

791 ms

tp1y23y0a12ckdpq2i9uelwl2v06v8fh.jpg

tp1y23y0a12ckdpq2i9uelwl2v06v8fh.jpg

1156 ms

noimage_product.svg

noimage_product.svg

457 ms

print.css

print.css

144 ms

Accessibility Review

instrument-msk.ru accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

instrument-msk.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

instrument-msk.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instrument-msk.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Instrument-msk.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

instrument-msk.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Instrument Msk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: