38 sec in total
3.9 sec
33.8 sec
271 ms
Welcome to intefree.com homepage info - get ready to check Intefree best content right away, or after learning these important things about intefree.com
Visit intefree.comWe analyzed Intefree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.9 sec and then it took 34.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
intefree.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value6.6 s
58/100
10%
3920 ms
257 ms
573 ms
581 ms
574 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Intefree.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Bdimg.share.baidu.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Pub.idqqimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Intefree.com.
Page size can be reduced by 218.7 kB (57%)
381.9 kB
163.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Intefree.com main page is 381.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 227.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intefree needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 147.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intefree.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (50%)
46
23
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intefree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.intefree.com
3920 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
257 ms
jquery.slimbox.css
573 ms
pagenavi-css.css
581 ms
styles.css
574 ms
jquery.js
849 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
584 ms
jquery.slimbox.js
568 ms
style.css
829 ms
jquery.js
1105 ms
jquery.megamenu.js
880 ms
stat.php
1766 ms
wp-embed.min.js
879 ms
group.png
664 ms
top_bg.jpg
1694 ms
logo3.jpg
2057 ms
ez898title.gif
1556 ms
hahoodesigntitle.gif
1910 ms
iez898.gif
1613 ms
ihahooshop.gif
1735 ms
idomain.gif
1800 ms
ihost.gif
1846 ms
400tel.gif
1925 ms
iweb.gif
1970 ms
zhenghe.jpg
2566 ms
seo.jpg
2309 ms
zhanshi.gif
3636 ms
menu_hover_bg.jpg
3033 ms
menu_right_border.jpg
2219 ms
ib_bg.jpg
2676 ms
shell_v2.js
809 ms
ib_content_bg.gif
4163 ms
web2_bg.jpg
2788 ms
dot1.jpg
2773 ms
main2bg.jpg
2899 ms
stat.htm
252 ms
core.php
1250 ms
bds_s_v2.js
388 ms
bdsstyle.css
1835 ms
getnum
2387 ms
9.gif
871 ms
pic.gif
557 ms
is.png
1496 ms
sc.png
3815 ms
logger.js
2467 ms
app.gif
843 ms
button_11.gif
219 ms
button_11.gif
374 ms
intefree.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
intefree.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intefree.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intefree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intefree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intefree.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intefree. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: