Tools & Wizards About Us
interamark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

interamark.com

Digital Marketing and Hubspot Agency in Ventura County

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

119 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

512 ms

interamark.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to interamark.com homepage info - get ready to check Interamark best content right away, or after learning these important things about interamark.com

A Digital Marketing Agency that is an expert in Graphic & Website Design, Video Creation, Content Services, Social Media Marketing, and SEO.

Visit interamark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interamark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interamark.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.327

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interamark.com

119 ms

home

154 ms

jquery-1.11.2.js

29 ms

main-head.css

229 ms

main-foot.min.css

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Interamark.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to 287445.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) relates to the external source 287445.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 242.8 kB (35%)

Content Size

699.3 kB

After Optimization

456.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interamark.com main page is 699.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 311.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 186.9 kB

  • Original 210.8 kB
  • After minification 190.4 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 118.7 kB
  • After minification 90.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Interamark needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 311.0 kB
  • After minification 311.0 kB
  • After compression 303.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 38.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interamark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (69%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interamark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interamark.com

interamark.com

119 ms

home

home

154 ms

jquery-1.11.2.js

jquery-1.11.2.js

29 ms

main-head.css

main-head.css

229 ms

main-foot.min.css

main-foot.min.css

247 ms

global-header-v2.min.css

global-header-v2.min.css

254 ms

global-footer.min.css

global-footer.min.css

211 ms

hero-banner.min.css

hero-banner.min.css

261 ms

row-multi-column-content.min.css

row-multi-column-content.min.css

262 ms

row-card-flippers.min.css

row-card-flippers.min.css

401 ms

row-icon-text.min.css

row-icon-text.min.css

406 ms

row-image-text-opt2.min.css

row-image-text-opt2.min.css

487 ms

row-blog-post-thumbnails.min.css

row-blog-post-thumbnails.min.css

485 ms

jquery-2.2.4-min.min.js

jquery-2.2.4-min.min.js

495 ms

js

js

102 ms

js

js

151 ms

widget.js

widget.js

111 ms

embed.js

embed.js

62 ms

clean-theme.min.js

clean-theme.min.js

458 ms

jquery-modal-min.min.js

jquery-modal-min.min.js

629 ms

project.js

project.js

431 ms

mega-menu.min.js

mega-menu.min.js

632 ms

module_47164847139_Global_Footer.min.js

module_47164847139_Global_Footer.min.js

715 ms

module_47164692915_CLEAN_-_Hero_Banner.min.js

module_47164692915_CLEAN_-_Hero_Banner.min.js

670 ms

card-flipper.min.js

card-flipper.min.js

687 ms

v2.js

v2.js

608 ms

module_47174725487_CLEAN_-_Row_-_Blog_Post_Thumbnails.min.js

module_47174725487_CLEAN_-_Row_-_Blog_Post_Thumbnails.min.js

836 ms

287445.js

287445.js

713 ms

index.js

index.js

670 ms

integrations-hubspot-v1.js

integrations-hubspot-v1.js

68 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

98 ms

hotjar-1696127.js

hotjar-1696127.js

177 ms

partner-horizontal-color-1.png

partner-horizontal-color-1.png

178 ms

415f416e-5d00-4184-bb9e-c43a90495119.png

415f416e-5d00-4184-bb9e-c43a90495119.png

185 ms

lazy-img-800x500.png

lazy-img-800x500.png

141 ms

logo-minimal-footer1.png

logo-minimal-footer1.png

204 ms

interamark-logo-guide.png

interamark-logo-guide.png

182 ms

Asset%202@4x.png

Asset%202@4x.png

234 ms

Asset%201-2.png

Asset%201-2.png

231 ms

Asset%202-1.png

Asset%202-1.png

226 ms

Asset%203-1.png

Asset%203-1.png

234 ms

search-engine-optimization.png

search-engine-optimization.png

252 ms

mkt-stck.png

mkt-stck.png

275 ms

logo-minimal-footer1.png

logo-minimal-footer1.png

275 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

235 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

511 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

541 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

894 ms

css

css

51 ms

font

font

20 ms

banner.js

banner.js

66 ms

fb.js

fb.js

43 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

65 ms

287445.js

287445.js

123 ms

embed_shepherd-v1.js

embed_shepherd-v1.js

40 ms

Accessibility Review

interamark.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

interamark.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

interamark.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interamark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interamark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interamark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interamark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: