Tools & Wizards About Us
intercoast.edu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

intercoast.edu

InterCoast Trade School: Vocational Training Programs

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

700 ms

intercoast.edu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intercoast.edu homepage info - get ready to check Inter Coast best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about intercoast.edu

InterCoast offers vocational programs for cybersecurity, healthcare, and skilled trades, focusing on technical skills and job readiness for in-demand careers.

Visit intercoast.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Intercoast.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intercoast.edu performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,540 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intercoast.edu

95 ms

intercoast.edu

238 ms

js

81 ms

style.min.css

102 ms

wpautoterms.css

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Intercoast.edu, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (786 ms) relates to the external source Accounts.onlineada.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.5 kB (59%)

Content Size

467.7 kB

After Optimization

190.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Intercoast.edu main page is 467.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 142.4 kB

  • Original 181.0 kB
  • After minification 178.3 kB
  • After compression 38.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inter Coast images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 135.1 kB

  • Original 220.5 kB
  • After minification 220.5 kB
  • After compression 85.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.1 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (95%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inter Coast. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intercoast.edu

intercoast.edu

95 ms

intercoast.edu

intercoast.edu

238 ms

js

js

81 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

102 ms

wpautoterms.css

wpautoterms.css

101 ms

sr7.css

sr7.css

110 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

style.css

style.css

134 ms

style.css

style.css

228 ms

adaptive.css

adaptive.css

159 ms

retina.css

retina.css

141 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

223 ms

fontello-custom.css

fontello-custom.css

197 ms

animate.css

animate.css

237 ms

ilightbox.css

ilightbox.css

172 ms

light-skin.css

light-skin.css

187 ms

schule.css

schule.css

329 ms

css

css

57 ms

frontend-style.css

frontend-style.css

217 ms

plugin-style.css

plugin-style.css

234 ms

plugin-adaptive.css

plugin-adaptive.css

247 ms

plugin-v2-style.css

plugin-v2-style.css

252 ms

style.css

style.css

259 ms

tooltipster.min.css

tooltipster.min.css

260 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

264 ms

paoc-public.min.css

paoc-public.min.css

304 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

312 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

289 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

291 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

298 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

325 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

326 ms

base.js

base.js

362 ms

gumlet.min.js

gumlet.min.js

46 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

363 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

364 ms

handl-utm-grabber.js

handl-utm-grabber.js

364 ms

tptools.js

tptools.js

365 ms

sr7.js

sr7.js

549 ms

client.js

client.js

138 ms

js

js

92 ms

widget-embed.js

widget-embed.js

59 ms

css2

css2

58 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

362 ms

wp-chatfuel-public.min.js

wp-chatfuel-public.min.js

270 ms

debounced-resize.min.js

debounced-resize.min.js

277 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

289 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

305 ms

jquery.iLightBox.min.js

jquery.iLightBox.min.js

305 ms

jquery.megaMenu.js

jquery.megaMenu.js

303 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

297 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

290 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

276 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

280 ms

date.min.js

date.min.js

421 ms

tooltipster.min.js

tooltipster.min.js

250 ms

paoc-public.min.js

paoc-public.min.js

247 ms

cmsmasters-hover-slider.min.js

cmsmasters-hover-slider.min.js

236 ms

easing.min.js

easing.min.js

316 ms

easy-pie-chart.min.js

easy-pie-chart.min.js

317 ms

mousewheel.min.js

mousewheel.min.js

367 ms

owlcarousel.min.js

owlcarousel.min.js

362 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

355 ms

request-animation-frame.min.js

request-animation-frame.min.js

353 ms

scrollspy.js

scrollspy.js

348 ms

scroll-to.min.js

scroll-to.min.js

560 ms

stellar.min.js

stellar.min.js

559 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

552 ms

jquery.script.js

jquery.script.js

543 ms

jquery.theme-script.js

jquery.theme-script.js

539 ms

jquery.tweet.min.js

jquery.tweet.min.js

525 ms

smooth-sticky.min.js

smooth-sticky.min.js

532 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

532 ms

fbt.js

fbt.js

452 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

172 ms

events.js

events.js

170 ms

VGWcBBbMgOvL9kpm4PLmenm1g2BWLQ4uOFSLig88kpsb7GjIlW

VGWcBBbMgOvL9kpm4PLmenm1g2BWLQ4uOFSLig88kpsb7GjIlW

786 ms

pixel.png

pixel.png

450 ms

widget.js

widget.js

772 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

418 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

533 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

534 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

535 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf

536 ms

fontello-custom.woff

fontello-custom.woff

338 ms

037144038-happy-young-students-table-stu-1.jpg

037144038-happy-young-students-table-stu-1.jpg

489 ms

main.MWU2NDEzYzJiMA.js

main.MWU2NDEzYzJiMA.js

231 ms

Accessibility Review

intercoast.edu accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

intercoast.edu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

intercoast.edu SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intercoast.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intercoast.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intercoast.edu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inter Coast. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: