Access interflex.de. Lösungen für Zeitwirtschaft und Zutrittskontrolle

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

interflex.de

119 ms

www.interflex.de

164 ms

index.html

9 ms

css

74 ms

font-awesome.min.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Interflex.de, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (196 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

753.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Interflex.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 728.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

Original 58.8 kB
After minification 43.2 kB
After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.7 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 68.1 kB

Original 602.9 kB
After minification 534.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Interflex needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 554.0 kB

Original 728.5 kB
After minification 572.3 kB
After compression 174.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 554.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 194.4 kB

Original 230.8 kB
After minification 212.6 kB
After compression 36.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interflex.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 194.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interflex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interflex.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Interflex.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interflex.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interflex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Lösungen für Zeitwirtschaft und Zutrittskontrolle - Interflex

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

interflex.de

www.interflex.de

index.html

css

font-awesome.min.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

interflex.de

www.interflex.de

index.html

css

font-awesome.min.css

main.css

static.css

interflex.css

jquery.min.js

utils.min.js

granite.min.js

jquery.min.js

shared.min.js

underscore.min.js

kernel.min.js

requirejs.js

analytics.js

1438785942640.png

1439968607038.png

arrow-left.png

arrow-right.png

1458633150970.jpg

caption-text-bg.png

1458633192888.jpg

1458633247241.jpg

1458633288665.jpg

arrow-right-large.png

1456827037071.png

1444659626736.png

1444659652523.png

1444659668551.png

1444659691232.png

1444659700637.png

1456837705151.png

1456827067977.png

1456827078969.png

1456827094327.png

1456827103703.png

1456827114543.png

1457016812040.jpg

1456931304092.jpg

1456825674905.jpg

1434395091219.png