19.4 sec in total
306 ms
15 sec
4 sec
Click here to check amazing Interglot content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interglot.com
The Interglot Translation Dictionary can be used to search for Dutch, English, German, French, Spanish, and Swedish translations.
Visit interglot.comWe analyzed Interglot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 306 ms and then it took 19.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
interglot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value13,950 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value25.5 s
0/100
10%
306 ms
655 ms
750 ms
855 ms
855 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Interglot.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to Interglot0-interglot.netdna-ssl.com and 15% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 469.0 kB (52%)
900.9 kB
431.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Interglot.com main page is 900.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 609.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interglot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 331.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 331.8 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interglot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (47%)
43
23
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interglot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interglot.com
306 ms
www.interglot.com
655 ms
css
750 ms
igcustom.1.174.min.css
855 ms
jquery.min.js
855 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1055 ms
igcustom.1.174.min.js
820 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
473 ms
ga.js
29 ms
header_bg.jpg
11 ms
igbanner4.jpg
382 ms
bgfull2.jpg
545 ms
searchbg.jpg
352 ms
flagsheet44.jpg
197 ms
bgfullbottom2.jpg
197 ms
inpage_linkid.js
19 ms
doRWK9Qks0OQGenH-kW8nje4rGmx_oKyPTpXBjgU-s4.ttf
259 ms
__utm.gif
72 ms
light-bottom.css
408 ms
query
1353 ms
poststats
1363 ms
plusone.js
1313 ms
load.js
593 ms
poststats
1307 ms
all.js
274 ms
logo.png
74 ms
loader.js
1406 ms
1268 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
898 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
912 ms
fastbutton
716 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
1044 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
3135 ms
2532 ms
rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA
1496 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
1494 ms
login_button.php
2509 ms
postmessageRelay
1901 ms
cloudflare.min.js
1595 ms
button.css
4446 ms
button.js
4446 ms
aD3zyzMYsIu.js
1898 ms
teE39sffXW8.png
4162 ms
iqVGY7gYXlg.gif
4486 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
3961 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
1064 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
24 ms
interglot.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interglot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
interglot.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interglot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interglot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interglot.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interglot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: