6.3 sec in total
775 ms
5.2 sec
339 ms
Welcome to intergraf.it homepage info - get ready to check Intergraf best content right away, or after learning these important things about intergraf.it
Intergraf, Web Design - WordPress Development. Realizzazione, promozione e gestione di siti web adatti ad ogni esigenza. Ecommerce, personalizzazione del tema, creazione plug-in su misura, ottimizzazi...
Visit intergraf.itWe analyzed Intergraf.it page load time and found that the first response time was 775 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
intergraf.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value23.6 s
0/100
10%
Value9,060 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
775 ms
288 ms
7 ms
230 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Intergraf.it, 12% (12 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (947 ms) belongs to the original domain Intergraf.it.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (65%)
1.9 MB
665.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Intergraf.it main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intergraf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 754.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 754.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 432.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intergraf.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 432.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (76%)
88
21
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intergraf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.intergraf.it
775 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
288 ms
jquery-ui.css
7 ms
style.css
230 ms
normalize.css
233 ms
font-awesome.min.css
330 ms
demo.css
225 ms
set2.css
334 ms
bootstrap.min.css
733 ms
css
26 ms
css
38 ms
style.css
331 ms
jetpack.css
541 ms
jquery.js
596 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
439 ms
contact-info-map.css
377 ms
photon.js
382 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
10 ms
gprofiles.js
62 ms
wpgroho.js
476 ms
snap.svg-min.js
783 ms
jquery.js
34 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
683 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
676 ms
miojukebox.js
581 ms
classie.js
626 ms
bootstrap.min.js
789 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
734 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
759 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
780 ms
classie.js
784 ms
cbpAnimatedHeader.js
839 ms
jqBootstrapValidation.js
864 ms
contact-me.js
888 ms
app.js
897 ms
comment-reply.min.js
890 ms
wp-embed.min.js
898 ms
js
47 ms
contact-info-map.js
947 ms
e-201611.js
29 ms
css
16 ms
style.css
716 ms
css
14 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
278 ms
loading_input.gif
274 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
29 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
28 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
29 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
243 ms
sdk.js
10 ms
analytics.js
116 ms
iframe_api
104 ms
hovercard.css
96 ms
services.css
110 ms
common.js
101 ms
map.js
127 ms
util.js
188 ms
marker.js
188 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
86 ms
g.gif
55 ms
collect
52 ms
366 ms
www-widgetapi.js
164 ms
xd_arbiter.php
127 ms
xd_arbiter.php
280 ms
onion.js
72 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
265 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
184 ms
stats.js
50 ms
controls.js
46 ms
videos
274 ms
css
171 ms
spotlight-poi.png
130 ms
transparent.png
137 ms
google4.png
87 ms
mapcnt6.png
89 ms
sv5.png
89 ms
tmapctrl.png
65 ms
cb_scout5.png
95 ms
tmapctrl4.png
82 ms
imgs8.png
94 ms
vt
81 ms
vt
78 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
84 ms
vt
76 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
51 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
76 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
76 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
277 ms
3yJa6bwd-fU
66 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
5 ms
www-embed-player.js
32 ms
base.js
59 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
35 ms
ad_status.js
104 ms
intergraf.it accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
intergraf.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
intergraf.it SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intergraf.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intergraf.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intergraf.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intergraf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: