2.1 sec in total
48 ms
928 ms
1.1 sec
Welcome to interpretive.com homepage info - get ready to check Interpretive best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about interpretive.com
Transform your classroom with Interpretive's engaging business simulations. Develop real-world skills and apply business concepts today!
Visit interpretive.comWe analyzed Interpretive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
interpretive.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
48 ms
106 ms
12 ms
55 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Interpretive.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (521 ms) relates to the external source Cdn-cookieyes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 164.1 kB (3%)
4.9 MB
4.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Interpretive.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interpretive images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interpretive.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (19%)
75
61
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interpretive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.interpretive.com
48 ms
css
106 ms
9x089.css
12 ms
bgs7w.css
55 ms
9x088.css
29 ms
css
107 ms
9x088.css
43 ms
js
212 ms
9x088.css
48 ms
script.js
521 ms
9x08l.js
102 ms
9x08k.js
51 ms
9x08k.js
47 ms
9x08k.js
102 ms
9x089.js
100 ms
gtm.js
211 ms
analytics.js
214 ms
Logo_xxsmall.png
145 ms
logo.png
123 ms
logo_black.png
123 ms
home-background-1-1.png
177 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image-96-1024x390.png
180 ms
generating-growth-by-joining-forces.jpg_s1024x1024wisk20cO14dswDRQCojFlNVPIGntO5luNPzFcQYKqUb7emQ56U.jpg
123 ms
tab_management-update-scaled.jpg
178 ms
Bizcafe-01.jpg
175 ms
Entre-01-scaled.jpg
175 ms
HR-01.jpg
177 ms
Airline-01.jpg
180 ms
StratSimManagement-01.jpg
181 ms
in-device-slider-desktop.png
431 ms
tab_marketing-updated-scaled.jpg
185 ms
NewShoes-01.jpg
181 ms
MarketShare-01.jpg
431 ms
PharmaSim-01.jpg
182 ms
CountryManager-01.jpg
183 ms
StratSimMarketing-01.jpg
185 ms
tab_strategy-update-scaled.jpg
186 ms
Corporation-01.jpg
183 ms
Erasmus.jpg
186 ms
northwestern.jpg
189 ms
U-M_Logo-Hex.png
187 ms
CBS.png
188 ms
cornell.png
189 ms
BU.png
188 ms
Indiana.jpg
190 ms
arizona.jpg
190 ms
tilburg.jpg
191 ms
duke.png
191 ms
toronto.png
192 ms
michigan.jpg
193 ms
Johannes-Kepler-University-Linz-150x150.jpg
191 ms
Tina-Klein-150x150.jpeg
192 ms
Palmer-Timothy-HCOB-dir_0-1-150x150.jpg
192 ms
font
146 ms
Benson-Honig-McMaster-University-150x150.jpg
76 ms
Nathalie-Dens-150x150.jpg
75 ms
Deborah-Colton-Hebert-Rochester-Institute-of-Technology-150x150.png
75 ms
grody-150x150.jpg
75 ms
font
125 ms
collect
90 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
79 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
79 ms
villa-college-150x150.png
78 ms
MichelleYoder-150x150.jpg
78 ms
alexander-milovic-e1681136917344-150x150.jpg
77 ms
Hooman-Estelami-Fordham-University-150x150.jpg
77 ms
clint-vogus-150x150.jpg
76 ms
Laura-Downey-Purdue-University-150x150.jpg
76 ms
Stenden-University-150x150.jpg
75 ms
steven-cox-150x150.jpg
75 ms
woman-looking-at-digital-tablet.jpg_s1024x1024wisk20cSQIhzDR6wS4Z-1JQouBT7Io9eyl6zk6JlocK5HALv3Q.jpg
78 ms
New-StratSim-Image-539x303.png
73 ms
3-logo-circles-smaller-transparent.png
73 ms
female-student-studying-at-college-library-picture-id620952978-4-539x303.jpg
72 ms
icons-06.png
72 ms
icons-03.png
71 ms
icons-01.png
73 ms
icons-07.png
71 ms
icons-04.png
71 ms
collect
169 ms
interpretive.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interpretive.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
interpretive.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interpretive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interpretive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interpretive.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interpretive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: