7.5 sec in total
1.4 sec
5.9 sec
211 ms
Welcome to intgn.com homepage info - get ready to check INTGN best content right away, or after learning these important things about intgn.com
IN TGN, acadèmia d'anglès a Tarragona, Reus i Valls. Cursos d'anglès personalitzats per a adults i nens, conversa, presencial i online.
Visit intgn.comWe analyzed Intgn.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
intgn.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value20.1 s
0/100
10%
Value5,450 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value20.7 s
2/100
10%
1429 ms
21 ms
32 ms
196 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Intgn.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Intgn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 687.1 kB (28%)
2.4 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Intgn.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INTGN images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 349.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intgn.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (76%)
89
21
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INTGN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intgn.com
1429 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
css
32 ms
language-selector.css
196 ms
styles.css
194 ms
style.css
393 ms
superfish.css
224 ms
prettyPhoto.css
293 ms
flexslider.css
225 ms
responsive.css
481 ms
colour.css
390 ms
css
32 ms
font-awesome.min.css
483 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.css
487 ms
layout.css
485 ms
jquery-ui.css
583 ms
frontend.css
580 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
core.min.js
671 ms
widget.min.js
676 ms
tabs.min.js
681 ms
accordion.min.js
680 ms
jquery.fittext.js
775 ms
mootools-core-1.4.5-min.js
1071 ms
easymedia.js
968 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
971 ms
frontend.js
872 ms
jquery.ba-bbq.min.js
872 ms
jquery.scrolltab.js
973 ms
button.min.js
1069 ms
jquery-unselectable.js
1069 ms
mouse.min.js
1160 ms
slider.min.js
1163 ms
base.js
1166 ms
custom.js
1262 ms
styleswitcher.js
1261 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1551 ms
mediaelementplayer-skin-yellow.css
1449 ms
dynamic-style.php
2130 ms
jay.css
1457 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
31 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.css
1452 ms
collect
15 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.css
1385 ms
jay.js
1432 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1434 ms
jquery.timers-1.2.js
1439 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.min.js
1558 ms
sitepress.js
1402 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.0.slider.min.js
1544 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
1371 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1372 ms
scripts.js
1504 ms
tinynav.min.js
1556 ms
css
13 ms
jquery.uniform.js
1560 ms
superfish.js
1469 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1554 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1603 ms
scripts.js
1553 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1651 ms
Dark.css
196 ms
Light.css
195 ms
intgn-logotipo.png
233 ms
social_facebook.png
235 ms
dot_border_h.png
235 ms
dot_border_v.png
235 ms
search_icon.png
236 ms
loader_01.gif
237 ms
9-nois-i-noies-a-terra-mirant-amunt-al-601.jpg
689 ms
Mans-reduides-encara-mes1.jpg
691 ms
9-caminant-800x600.jpg
694 ms
Club-i-flors.jpg
1104 ms
Club-11.jpg
1119 ms
Aula-2-llarga.jpg
999 ms
header_icon_01.png
882 ms
header_icon_02.png
884 ms
header_icon_03.png
902 ms
header_icon_04.png
1076 ms
header_icon_05.png
1079 ms
acreditacion-examinadores.gif
1395 ms
arrow_up.png
1192 ms
es.png
1268 ms
ca.png
1273 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
118 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
117 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
114 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
116 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
116 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
117 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf
117 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
118 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
118 ms
arrow_down.png
1112 ms
select.png
1124 ms
pattern-11.png
1200 ms
Transparent.css
99 ms
arrow_prev_02.png
195 ms
arrow_next_02.png
196 ms
intgn.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intgn.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
intgn.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
CA
CA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intgn.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Catalan is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intgn.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intgn.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INTGN. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: