Tools & Wizards About Us
inthought.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

inthought.com

Life Science Consulting & Market Research | inThought Research

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

116 ms

Resources Loaded

639 ms

Page Rendered

435 ms

inthought.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing InThought content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inthought.com

inThought Research is a leading pharmaceutical and life science consulting firm providing analytical, forecasting, and competitive intelligence services.

Visit inthought.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inthought.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inthought.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,070 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inthought.com

116 ms

autoptimize_7ef59ab5aad22bcd48a6b23908335759.css

25 ms

autoptimize_single_e554a096b4dc1fc242e25ec4958d05e2.css

55 ms

jquery.min.js

86 ms

js

265 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Inthought.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (265 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

891.0 kB

After Optimization

759.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inthought.com main page is 891.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 439.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 130.1 kB

  • Original 153.8 kB
  • After minification 153.0 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 138.9 kB
  • After minification 138.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. InThought images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 439.0 kB
  • After minification 439.0 kB
  • After compression 437.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 159.3 kB
  • After minification 159.3 kB
  • After compression 159.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inthought.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (43%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of InThought. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inthought.com

inthought.com

116 ms

autoptimize_7ef59ab5aad22bcd48a6b23908335759.css

autoptimize_7ef59ab5aad22bcd48a6b23908335759.css

25 ms

autoptimize_single_e554a096b4dc1fc242e25ec4958d05e2.css

autoptimize_single_e554a096b4dc1fc242e25ec4958d05e2.css

55 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

86 ms

js

js

265 ms

api.js

api.js

140 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

137 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

137 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

137 ms

autoptimize_f8723c066c88f4117034284b09c88e4a.js

autoptimize_f8723c066c88f4117034284b09c88e4a.js

138 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

166 ms

inThought-Logo-Transparent-3.7.png

inThought-Logo-Transparent-3.7.png

178 ms

DNA-head-side_1200x400px.jpg

DNA-head-side_1200x400px.jpg

178 ms

inthought.com

inthought.com

177 ms

inphronesis-logo-300x83.png

inphronesis-logo-300x83.png

177 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-8-e1552061760431-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-8-e1552061760431-180x180.png

149 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-5-e1552061697262-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-5-e1552061697262-180x180.png

177 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-7-e1552061656856-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-7-e1552061656856-180x180.png

177 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-6-e1552061619690-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-6-e1552061619690-180x180.png

241 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-4-e1552061561773-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-4-e1552061561773-180x180.png

178 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-2-e1552061426568-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-2-e1552061426568-180x180.png

242 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-1-e1552061464959-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-1-e1552061464959-180x180.png

179 ms

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-e1552061497195-180x180.png

AdobeStock_205717057_New-min-e1552061497195-180x180.png

241 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

177 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

205 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

114 ms

89 ms

loader.js

loader.js

51 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

call-tracking_7.js

call-tracking_7.js

19 ms

js

js

76 ms

16 ms

wcm

wcm

16 ms

Accessibility Review

inthought.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inthought.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

inthought.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inthought.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inthought.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inthought.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of InThought. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: