Tools & Wizards About Us
intsg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

intsg.com

Technology Solutions for Grain and Bulk Products - Integrated Solutions Group, Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

289 ms

Resources Loaded

979 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

intsg.com screenshot

About Website

Visit intsg.com now to see the best up-to-date Intsg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intsg.com

Software products for Quality Management (LIMS) and Supply Chain Management including Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) and Remote Inventory Monitoring (RIM)

Visit intsg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intsg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intsg.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intsg.com

289 ms

widgetkit-a0bb9305.css

111 ms

slideshow.min.css

74 ms

mootools-core.js

153 ms

core.js

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intsg.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) belongs to the original domain Intsg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 525.2 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intsg.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intsg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 394.6 kB

  • Original 568.3 kB
  • After minification 562.9 kB
  • After compression 173.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 102.2 kB

  • Original 125.8 kB
  • After minification 113.5 kB
  • After compression 23.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intsg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (63%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intsg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intsg.com

intsg.com

289 ms

widgetkit-a0bb9305.css

widgetkit-a0bb9305.css

111 ms

slideshow.min.css

slideshow.min.css

74 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

153 ms

core.js

core.js

79 ms

caption.js

caption.js

79 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

171 ms

widgetkit-309deaa2.js

widgetkit-309deaa2.js

114 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

297 ms

slideshow.min.js

slideshow.min.js

170 ms

slideshow.kenburns.min.js

slideshow.kenburns.min.js

152 ms

reset.css

reset.css

169 ms

layout.css

layout.css

193 ms

typography.css

typography.css

192 ms

menus.css

menus.css

193 ms

modules.css

modules.css

198 ms

system.css

system.css

197 ms

extensions.css

extensions.css

233 ms

beige.css

beige.css

234 ms

custom.css

custom.css

231 ms

warp.js

warp.js

237 ms

accordionmenu.js

accordionmenu.js

237 ms

dropdownmenu.js

dropdownmenu.js

269 ms

template.js

template.js

273 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

93 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

140 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

95 ms

system.css

system.css

43 ms

system.css

system.css

42 ms

page_header_img_t-s.png

page_header_img_t-s.png

43 ms

page_header_b.png

page_header_b.png

41 ms

page_header_img_b.png

page_header_img_b.png

42 ms

ISGLogo.png

ISGLogo.png

72 ms

menu_level1_item.png

menu_level1_item.png

47 ms

page_top_t.png

page_top_t.png

45 ms

page_top_img.png

page_top_img.png

82 ms

module_rounded_white_corners.png

module_rounded_white_corners.png

82 ms

module_rounded_white_edges.png

module_rounded_white_edges.png

83 ms

Coors%20Burley%201.jpg

Coors%20Burley%201.jpg

175 ms

Coors%20Huntley.JPG

Coors%20Huntley.JPG

136 ms

Coors%20Monte%20Vista.jpg

Coors%20Monte%20Vista.jpg

182 ms

alix%20plant%202%20Plant%20View%201.jpg

alix%20plant%202%20Plant%20View%201.jpg

209 ms

rahr%20from%20south.jpg

rahr%20from%20south.jpg

211 ms

page_middle_t.png

page_middle_t.png

126 ms

page_middle_b.png

page_middle_b.png

168 ms

page_middle_img.png

page_middle_img.png

178 ms

main_wrapper_corners.png

main_wrapper_corners.png

210 ms

article_separator.png

article_separator.png

215 ms

module_rounded_white_header.png

module_rounded_white_header.png

221 ms

readmore.png

readmore.png

220 ms

13_07_57_web.jpg

13_07_57_web.jpg

253 ms

footerBack.png

footerBack.png

250 ms

footer_anchor.png

footer_anchor.png

253 ms

topmenu_item_bg.png

topmenu_item_bg.png

255 ms

loader.png

loader.png

42 ms

Accessibility Review

intsg.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

intsg.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intsg.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intsg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intsg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intsg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intsg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: