4 sec in total
277 ms
3.2 sec
473 ms
Click here to check amazing Ip Label content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ip-label.com
ip-label has been helping enterprises manage and optimize their digital services with its solutions for measuring and analyzing user quality of experience.
Visit ip-label.comWe analyzed Ip-label.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ip-label.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value4,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.084
93/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
277 ms
1262 ms
155 ms
24 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ip-label.com, 53% (48 requests) were made to Ip-label.co.uk and 31% (28 requests) were made to Ip-label.fr. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Ip-label.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 957.7 kB (40%)
2.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ip-label.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ip Label needs image optimization as it can save up to 235.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 280.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 280.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 335.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ip-label.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 335.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (57%)
81
35
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ip Label. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ip-label.com
277 ms
www.ip-label.co.uk
1262 ms
language-selector.css
155 ms
font-awesome.min.css
24 ms
js
32 ms
prettyPhoto.css
196 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
197 ms
styles.css
189 ms
settings.css
196 ms
captions.php
601 ms
navigation.css
197 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
197 ms
cms-navigation.css
255 ms
style.css
187 ms
mfn-icons.css
188 ms
isotope.css
188 ms
grid.css
189 ms
shortcodes.css
228 ms
animations.min.css
234 ms
colorpicker.css
241 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
237 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
241 ms
responsive.css
241 ms
style-colors.php
727 ms
style.php
838 ms
jquery.mmenu.positioning.css
316 ms
jquery.mmenu.css
317 ms
component.css
315 ms
style.css
397 ms
flaticon.css
392 ms
css
27 ms
jquery.js
328 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
248 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
261 ms
video-lightbox.js
262 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
403 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
410 ms
391 ms
475 ms
547 ms
474 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
181 ms
transparent.png
146 ms
logo.png
418 ms
btn-close.png
419 ms
avatar-login.png
417 ms
APM2.jpg
618 ms
3_critical_app_00.png
145 ms
web_app_icon.png
145 ms
mobility_000001.png
417 ms
multimedia_00000.png
417 ms
troubleshooting_icon.png
419 ms
load_testing_00000.png
419 ms
webtv2.png
420 ms
allianz.png
419 ms
air-france-klm.png
420 ms
orange.png
421 ms
parlement-europeen.png
422 ms
voyages-scnf.png
422 ms
hsbc.png
422 ms
logo-footer.png
428 ms
laptop1.jpg
419 ms
smartphone.png
422 ms
connected-car2.jpg
417 ms
logo-dataviz-2.png
143 ms
screen-2.png
500 ms
screen-1.png
424 ms
home_slider_datametrie2.png
500 ms
home_slider_datametrie1.png
501 ms
logo-datametrie2.png
421 ms
logo_datapm_grand.png
425 ms
home_slider_datacore2.png
741 ms
imageSITE-cta1png.png
795 ms
ico-metric.png
378 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
20 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
21 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
media-center.png
359 ms
flaticon.woff
281 ms
loaderIzeeChat.js
262 ms
analytics.js
250 ms
timer.png
91 ms
box_shadow.png
91 ms
slider-prev.png
92 ms
slider-next.png
89 ms
collect
46 ms
contactBox-1.29.min.js
249 ms
ip-label.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ip-label.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ip-label.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ip-label.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ip-label.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ip-label.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ip Label. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: