2.8 sec in total
46 ms
2.1 sec
665 ms
Click here to check amazing Ip content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ip.com
IP.com® combines ideation, problem-solving, intellectual property, patent intelligence software, & comprehensive services to accelerate innovation workflows.
Visit ip.comWe analyzed Ip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
46 ms
984 ms
23 ms
35 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Ip.com, 19% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Go.to.ip.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (984 ms) belongs to the original domain Ip.com.
Page size can be reduced by 461.9 kB (11%)
4.3 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Ip.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 414.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 414.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (52%)
79
38
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ip.com
46 ms
ip.com
984 ms
index.min.css
23 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
35 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
42 ms
core.min.css
41 ms
css
48 ms
style.min.css
28 ms
style.min.css
32 ms
account.css
34 ms
style.css
36 ms
extra.css
39 ms
shopbuildpublish.css
39 ms
jquery.min.js
46 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
40 ms
account.js
40 ms
et-core-unified-14.min.css
41 ms
js
191 ms
slick.min.css
40 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
41 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
43 ms
popup.min.js
44 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
46 ms
magnific-popup.js
48 ms
main.min.js
47 ms
dtq-default-vb.js
131 ms
scripts.min.js
129 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
131 ms
jquery.mobile.js
131 ms
easypiechart.js
162 ms
salvattore.js
163 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
189 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
191 ms
common.js
191 ms
slick.min.js
189 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
199 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
195 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
195 ms
helper.min.js
198 ms
css2
18 ms
gtm.js
251 ms
9wyrt
655 ms
api.min.js
294 ms
patent-search-software-col-bg.png
354 ms
ip.com-innovation-patent-search-software.png
344 ms
twitter.svg
276 ms
linkedin.svg
275 ms
facebook.svg
273 ms
youtube.svg
272 ms
patent-search-software-innovation-software.jpg
346 ms
intellectual-property-innovation-lifecycle-IP-industries.jpg
349 ms
patent-search-software-quote-bg.jpg
344 ms
carestream-slider.png
343 ms
ge-slider.png
343 ms
IBM-slider.png
342 ms
inventionshare-color-slider.png
345 ms
jnj-slider.png
344 ms
kodak-alaris-slider.png
347 ms
motorola.png
347 ms
pg-slider.png
346 ms
qvi-slider.png
348 ms
titan-medical.png
350 ms
uspto-logo.png
350 ms
ypsomed-slider.png
349 ms
NetApp-Data-Management2.png
353 ms
still1.jpg
343 ms
ip-iq-ideas.png
340 ms
ip-innovationq.png
307 ms
IPcom_Suite_WS_PriorArtBase_Logo_1color_White_RGB.png
307 ms
patent-vitality-report-patent-search-software.jpg
284 ms
technology-vitality-report-patent-search-software.jpg
287 ms
portfolio-intelligence-report.jpg
287 ms
patent-licensing-opportunities.jpg
396 ms
pic2-400x250.jpg
280 ms
corporations-400x250.jpg
279 ms
conference-attendees-400x250.jpg
280 ms
ip.com-footer-bg.jpg
390 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
179 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
180 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
213 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
213 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
214 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_fWR15d.woff
214 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_f_R15d.woff
212 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_eYR15d.woff
214 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_ehR15d.woff
251 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_dNQF5d.woff
252 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_d_QF5d.woff
251 ms
_Xmz-HUzqDCFdgfMsYiV_F7wfS-Bs_chQF5d.woff
250 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3Ax8ayEY.woff
286 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3AzYayEY.woff
285 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3A1EayEY.woff
339 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3A2gayEY.woff
284 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3A4QdyEY.woff
283 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3A7YdyEY.woff
282 ms
_Xm9-HUzqDCFdgfMm4GnA4aZFrUvtOK3A-gdyEY.woff
340 ms
modules.woff
139 ms
form.css
72 ms
piUtils.js
113 ms
required.gif
57 ms
pd.js
89 ms
ip.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ip.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ip.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: