3.5 sec in total
417 ms
2.8 sec
283 ms
Welcome to ipec.in homepage info - get ready to check Ipec best content right away, or after learning these important things about ipec.in
International Prosthetic Eye Center: Hyderabad India
Visit ipec.inWe analyzed Ipec.in page load time and found that the first response time was 417 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ipec.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.456
20/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
417 ms
95 ms
193 ms
187 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Ipec.in, 5% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ipec.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (57%)
2.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ipec.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 851.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ipec needs image optimization as it can save up to 851.6 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 281.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.3 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipec.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (43%)
75
43
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ipec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ipec.in
417 ms
nivo-slider.css
95 ms
style.css
193 ms
noscript.css
187 ms
colorpicker.css
189 ms
style-switcher.css
189 ms
lytebox.css
198 ms
lytebox.js
201 ms
jquery.js
386 ms
cufon-yui.js
284 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
285 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
283 ms
jquery.cookie.js
290 ms
colorpicker.js
300 ms
switcher.js
377 ms
element.js
35 ms
reset.css
187 ms
jqueryslidemenu.css
193 ms
shadow.png
104 ms
flower2.jpg
214 ms
logo2.png
519 ms
translateelement.css
82 ms
main.js
98 ms
nWPnFk7A2qc
96 ms
slide0.jpg
440 ms
slide1.jpg
438 ms
slide5.jpg
438 ms
slide3.jpg
511 ms
slide2.jpg
451 ms
slide4.jpg
767 ms
feature1.png
435 ms
feature3.png
436 ms
feature4.png
487 ms
pic23.1.jpg
489 ms
pic23.2.jpg
530 ms
pic23.3.jpg
530 ms
pic23.4.jpg
581 ms
pic23.5.jpg
582 ms
pic23.6.jpg
601 ms
image1.jpg
625 ms
image2.jpg
625 ms
image3.jpg
680 ms
logo1.jpg
679 ms
logo2.jpg
693 ms
logo3.jpg
721 ms
logo4.jpg
720 ms
logo5.jpg
777 ms
logo6.jpg
777 ms
logo7.jpg
788 ms
twitter.png
815 ms
linkedin.png
816 ms
facebook.png
852 ms
email.png
873 ms
round-wrapper-top.png
872 ms
round-wrapper-content.png
879 ms
bgmenu.jpg
1778 ms
menu-divider.png
909 ms
topmenu.png
922 ms
element_main.js
54 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
78 ms
www-embed-player.js
135 ms
base.js
162 ms
translate_24dp.png
94 ms
l
72 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
110 ms
bg-dropdown.png
837 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
49 ms
ad_status.js
36 ms
divider.png
547 ms
round-wrapper-bottom.png
548 ms
shadow-divider.png
581 ms
rounded-overlay.png
613 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
31 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
33 ms
footer-top.png
631 ms
transparent.png
94 ms
arrows.png
96 ms
gray_pager.png
96 ms
ipec.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ipec.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ipec.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipec.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ipec.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ipec.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ipec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: