5.6 sec in total
511 ms
4.8 sec
286 ms
Click here to check amazing Ipggroup content for Morocco. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ipggroup.eu
WEngage is so much more than a call center and combines skilled staff with technology and processes to strengthen your customer connections.
Visit ipggroup.euWe analyzed Ipggroup.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 511 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ipggroup.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.7 s
34/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.13
82/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
511 ms
83 ms
247 ms
164 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Ipggroup.eu, 4% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ipggroup.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 499.0 kB (19%)
2.6 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ipggroup.eu main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ipggroup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipggroup.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (67%)
85
28
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ipggroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ipggroup.eu
511 ms
language-selector.css
83 ms
style.css
247 ms
component.css
164 ms
modernizr.custom.js
168 ms
styles.css
166 ms
front.css
673 ms
creativsocial-styles.css
1676 ms
navigation.css
243 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
281 ms
cms-navigation.css
282 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
409 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
329 ms
front.js
328 ms
jquery.cookie.js
329 ms
browser-redirect.js
409 ms
buttons.js
6 ms
classie.js
408 ms
uisearch.js
408 ms
comment-reply.min.js
487 ms
jquery.form.min.js
487 ms
scripts.js
490 ms
retina.js
489 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
568 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
568 ms
hoverIntent.js
571 ms
jquery.sfmenu.js
571 ms
jquery.validate.pack.js
649 ms
comment-form-validation.js
650 ms
jquery.easing.js
651 ms
dynamic.to.top.min.js
651 ms
wp-embed.min.js
729 ms
sitepress.js
730 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
463 ms
Icon_Twitter_30x30.png
382 ms
Icon_Facebook_30x30.png
382 ms
Icon_Linkedin_30x30.png
384 ms
mail.png
384 ms
Icon_zoekfunctie_30x30.png
382 ms
global.svg
384 ms
arrow_right.svg
386 ms
corner.svg
389 ms
logo-IPG.svg
390 ms
everycontact1.jpg
393 ms
Icon_Twitter_55x55.svg
389 ms
Icon_Facebook_55x55.svg
387 ms
Icon_Linkedin_55x55.svg
393 ms
Brussels1_BEL.jpg
899 ms
Brussels2_BEL.jpg
902 ms
Roubaix_FR.jpg
1773 ms
Rabat_MA.jpg
898 ms
Breda_NL.jpg
923 ms
belgium2.jpg
394 ms
france.jpg
449 ms
morroco.jpg
498 ms
netherlands.jpg
575 ms
red-hoverarrow.png
656 ms
values.jpg
816 ms
newsletter.jpg
978 ms
trends.gif
977 ms
twitter.png
978 ms
facebook.png
979 ms
linkedin.png
1002 ms
footer_banner.jpg
1057 ms
analytics.js
317 ms
all.js
308 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
851 ms
slider-dots.svg
684 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
55 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
56 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
collect
39 ms
collect
91 ms
81 ms
xd_arbiter.php
33 ms
xd_arbiter.php
40 ms
getSegment.php
155 ms
checkOAuth.esi
9 ms
t.dhj
8 ms
t.dhj
148 ms
x35248
119 ms
s-3271.xgi
17 ms
pixel
50 ms
hbpix
33 ms
pixel
23 ms
8 ms
xrefid.xgi
9 ms
11 ms
pixel
23 ms
pixel
20 ms
cm
10 ms
2981
18 ms
ipggroup.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ipggroup.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ipggroup.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipggroup.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ipggroup.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ipggroup.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ipggroup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: