Tools & Wizards About Us
ipimp.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

ipimp.no

iPimp.no: Reservedelslager innen mobil og nettbrett

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

337 ms

Resources Loaded

734 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

ipimp.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing IPimp content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ipimp.no

Reservedelslager innen mobil og nettbrett. Stiftet i 2012. iPimp.no har hovedkontor i Oslo Sentrum hovedlager i Furuset/Oslo.

Visit ipimp.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Ipimp.no page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 833 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ipimp.no performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,780 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ipimp.no

337 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

369 ms

responsive.js

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ipimp.no and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (369 ms) belongs to the original domain Ipimp.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.2 kB (65%)

Content Size

100.1 kB

After Optimization

34.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ipimp.no main page is 100.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 98.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 996 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 702 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 996 B or 59% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 64.2 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 97.7 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IPimp. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ipimp.no

ipimp.no

337 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

369 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

215 ms

Accessibility Review

ipimp.no accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ipimp.no best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ipimp.no SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipimp.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ipimp.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ipimp.no

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IPimp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: