Tools & Wizards About Us
iridia.bg screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

iridia.bg

?????? ??? - ????????????? ??????????, ??????????, ?????????? ?????????? - Chicago Pneumatic - ??????

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

iridia.bg screenshot

About Website

Welcome to iridia.bg homepage info - get ready to check Iridia best content right away, or after learning these important things about iridia.bg

???????? ? ?????? ?? ????????????? ?????????? ?? ???????????? ????????, ???? ?? ??????? ? ??????? ??????????, ????????, ??????, ??????????, ??????, ???????? ?????, ??????????? ?????? ????????? 1/2" ch...

Visit iridia.bg

Key Findings

We analyzed Iridia.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iridia.bg performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iridia.bg

1566 ms

template_css.css

615 ms

space.gif

147 ms

center.jpg

241 ms

left.jpg

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Iridia.bg, 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Iridia.bg.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.7 kB (13%)

Content Size

415.3 kB

After Optimization

359.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Iridia.bg main page is 415.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 330.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 45.0 kB

  • Original 54.9 kB
  • After minification 53.3 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 330.9 kB
  • After minification 330.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Iridia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iridia.bg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (34%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iridia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

iridia.bg

iridia.bg

1566 ms

template_css.css

template_css.css

615 ms

space.gif

space.gif

147 ms

center.jpg

center.jpg

241 ms

left.jpg

left.jpg

350 ms

banner_Iridia_ok2.png

banner_Iridia_ok2.png

351 ms

right.jpg

right.jpg

366 ms

shadowl.jpg

shadowl.jpg

367 ms

shadowr.jpg

shadowr.jpg

367 ms

lb.gif

lb.gif

368 ms

modul.jpg

modul.jpg

463 ms

header.gif

header.gif

463 ms

cp8849_220x243.jpg

cp8849_220x243.jpg

592 ms

cp5000_maslo.jpg

cp5000_maslo.jpg

594 ms

cp7782-6%20promo.jpg

cp7782-6%20promo.jpg

592 ms

cp7748%20promo.jpg

cp7748%20promo.jpg

596 ms

cp7749%20promo.jpg

cp7749%20promo.jpg

664 ms

cp7736%20promo.jpg

cp7736%20promo.jpg

555 ms

chicago%20pneumatic%20iridia%20impact%20wrench%20cp749.jpg

chicago%20pneumatic%20iridia%20impact%20wrench%20cp749.jpg

667 ms

cp6748ex-p11r%20atex.jpg

cp6748ex-p11r%20atex.jpg

688 ms

cp6500-rsr%20.jpg

cp6500-rsr%20.jpg

687 ms

cp734h_m.jpg

cp734h_m.jpg

679 ms

cprd_8500_ns6000_ft_15_m.jpg

cprd_8500_ns6000_ft_15_m.jpg

683 ms

almig%2018%20flex.jpg

almig%2018%20flex.jpg

882 ms

kompresori%20chicago%20pneumatic%20iridia.jpg

kompresori%20chicago%20pneumatic%20iridia.jpg

772 ms

screw%20kompresori%20remeza%20iridia.jpg

screw%20kompresori%20remeza%20iridia.jpg

802 ms

kompresori%20aircast%20remeza%20iridia.jpg

kompresori%20aircast%20remeza%20iridia.jpg

910 ms

rb.gif

rb.gif

801 ms

center2.jpg

center2.jpg

802 ms

left2.jpg

left2.jpg

886 ms

ltop.jpg

ltop.jpg

917 ms

rtop.jpg

rtop.jpg

916 ms

right2.jpg

right2.jpg

920 ms

ga.js

ga.js

16 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

Accessibility Review

iridia.bg accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

iridia.bg best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

iridia.bg SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iridia.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Iridia.bg main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

iridia.bg

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Iridia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: