Tools & Wizards About Us
ironfinder.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ironfinder.com

Ironfinder.com is Permanently Closed

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

228 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

ironfinder.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ironfinder content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ironfinder.com

Ironfinder can help you replace missing individual golf irons with a huge selection of single, replacement golf clubs and excellent customer service

Visit ironfinder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ironfinder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ironfinder.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ironfinder.com

228 ms

www.ironfinder.com

533 ms

ifv0002.js

274 ms

stylesV1.css

280 ms

monkeyaround.gif

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Ironfinder.com, 47% (9 requests) were made to Server5.ironfinder.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (533 ms) belongs to the original domain Ironfinder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

173.6 kB

After Optimization

122.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ironfinder.com main page is 173.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 129.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 129.6 kB
  • After minification 99.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ironfinder needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 21.4 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 889 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ironfinder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ironfinder. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ironfinder.com

ironfinder.com

228 ms

www.ironfinder.com

www.ironfinder.com

533 ms

ifv0002.js

ifv0002.js

274 ms

stylesV1.css

stylesV1.css

280 ms

monkeyaround.gif

monkeyaround.gif

185 ms

IF_Logo2.gif

IF_Logo2.gif

100 ms

rarrow.gif

rarrow.gif

98 ms

RedLineAboveandBelow.gif

RedLineAboveandBelow.gif

206 ms

mrhspeedaw.jpg

mrhspeedaw.jpg

360 ms

mrhcl588alt9.jpg

mrhcl588alt9.jpg

361 ms

cart.gif

cart.gif

171 ms

mrh_adams_xtd_6.jpg

mrh_adams_xtd_6.jpg

333 ms

P00351.jpg

P00351.jpg

369 ms

ApexEdge_5.jpg

ApexEdge_5.jpg

362 ms

P00355.jpg

P00355.jpg

421 ms

ga.js

ga.js

7 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

collect

collect

66 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

42 ms

Accessibility Review

ironfinder.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ironfinder.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ironfinder.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ironfinder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ironfinder.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ironfinder.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ironfinder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: