Tools & Wizards About Us
isarail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

isarail.com

Isarail – Independent Safety Assessor

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

367 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

isarail.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to isarail.com homepage info - get ready to check Isarail best content right away, or after learning these important things about isarail.com

Visit isarail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Isarail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 367 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

isarail.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

isarail.com

367 ms

www.isarail.com

1459 ms

style.min.css

264 ms

full-styles.6.10.0.css

503 ms

mkhb-render.css

366 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Isarail.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Isarail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 597.1 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Isarail.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 113.4 kB

  • Original 135.0 kB
  • After minification 132.2 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Isarail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 461.3 kB

  • Original 638.8 kB
  • After minification 634.7 kB
  • After compression 177.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 461.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 178.1 kB
  • After minification 177.8 kB
  • After compression 172.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Isarail.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Isarail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

isarail.com

isarail.com

367 ms

www.isarail.com

www.isarail.com

1459 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

264 ms

full-styles.6.10.0.css

full-styles.6.10.0.css

503 ms

mkhb-render.css

mkhb-render.css

366 ms

mkhb-row.css

mkhb-row.css

365 ms

mkhb-column.css

mkhb-column.css

390 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

587 ms

theme-options-production-1693393650.css

theme-options-production-1693393650.css

411 ms

shortcodes-styles.min.css

shortcodes-styles.min.css

765 ms

style.css

style.css

507 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

528 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

741 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

655 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

545 ms

owl.min.css

owl.min.css

574 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

633 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

672 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

744 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

744 ms

full-scripts.6.10.0.js

full-scripts.6.10.0.js

1149 ms

mkhb-render.js

mkhb-render.js

850 ms

mkhb-column.js

mkhb-column.js

850 ms

shortcodes-scripts.min.js

shortcodes-scripts.min.js

947 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

925 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

877 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

951 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

947 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1039 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

1067 ms

vc_grid.min.js

vc_grid.min.js

1095 ms

css

css

55 ms

logo-isarail.png

logo-isarail.png

302 ms

organismo-notificato-1024x683.jpg

organismo-notificato-1024x683.jpg

572 ms

organismo-designato-1024x543.jpg

organismo-designato-1024x543.jpg

692 ms

valutazione-indipendente-della-sicurezza-isa-1024x683.jpg

valutazione-indipendente-della-sicurezza-isa-1024x683.jpg

604 ms

certificazione-ecm-1024x683.jpg

certificazione-ecm-1024x683.jpg

573 ms

organismo-di-valutazione-1024x683.jpg

organismo-di-valutazione-1024x683.jpg

715 ms

laboratorio-e-certificazione-etcs-di-bordo-1024x682.jpg

laboratorio-e-certificazione-etcs-di-bordo-1024x682.jpg

574 ms

header_new_website_accreditation_mobil.jpg

header_new_website_accreditation_mobil.jpg

847 ms

tranvie-1024x634.jpg

tranvie-1024x634.jpg

755 ms

merci-pericolose-1024x596.jpg

merci-pericolose-1024x596.jpg

685 ms

vc_gitem_image.png

vc_gitem_image.png

733 ms

font

font

20 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

760 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

743 ms

prev.png

prev.png

293 ms

next.png

next.png

321 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

326 ms

close.png

close.png

397 ms

Accessibility Review

isarail.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

isarail.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

isarail.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Isarail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Isarail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

isarail.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Isarail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: