1.2 sec in total
40 ms
839 ms
287 ms
Click here to check amazing ISSOP content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about issop.org
Visit issop.orgWe analyzed Issop.org page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
issop.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,320 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
40 ms
58 ms
17 ms
36 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Issop.org, 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) belongs to the original domain Issop.org.
Page size can be reduced by 236.2 kB (27%)
871.0 kB
634.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Issop.org main page is 871.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 480.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ISSOP needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 58 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Issop.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58 B or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (77%)
86
20
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ISSOP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
issop.org
40 ms
issop.org
58 ms
style.min.css
17 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
36 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
39 ms
style.css
56 ms
dashicons.min.css
60 ms
everest-forms.css
57 ms
intlTelInput.css
50 ms
social-icons.css
52 ms
smoothness-jquery-ui.min.css
52 ms
ec-store.css
83 ms
css
94 ms
owl.carousel.css
64 ms
be.css
98 ms
animations.min.css
66 ms
fontawesome.css
73 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.min.css
70 ms
responsive.css
94 ms
css
119 ms
common.css
79 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
79 ms
app.css
121 ms
look-201704.css
119 ms
jquery-ui-smoothness.css
119 ms
ajax-get-post.js
114 ms
jquery.min.js
131 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
113 ms
core.min.js
146 ms
accordion.min.js
145 ms
datepicker.min.js
152 ms
ec-store.js
158 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
149 ms
jquery.payment.min.js
149 ms
74 ms
css
260 ms
colorbox.css
153 ms
styles.css
152 ms
pagination.min.css
154 ms
post-5526.css
148 ms
widgets.js
61 ms
in.js
59 ms
e-202437.js
51 ms
rs6.css
153 ms
rbtools.min.js
254 ms
rs6.min.js
342 ms
inspector.js
129 ms
tabs.min.js
129 ms
debouncedresize.min.js
218 ms
magnificpopup.min.js
217 ms
menu.js
216 ms
visible.min.js
217 ms
animations.min.js
212 ms
jplayer.min.js
214 ms
enllax.min.js
207 ms
translate3d.js
203 ms
scripts.js
302 ms
comment-reply.min.js
193 ms
jquery.form.min.js
294 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
294 ms
files-list.js
281 ms
download-helper.js
277 ms
wp_footer.js
258 ms
slick.min.js
259 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
256 ms
custom.js
254 ms
wpra-manifest.min.js
255 ms
pagination.min.js
227 ms
lazyload.min.js
228 ms
lcp-beacon.min.js
224 ms
mw_joomla_logo-200x50-1.png
446 ms
dummy.png
117 ms
stripes_3_b.png
117 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
131 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
372 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
411 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
409 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf
298 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf
299 ms
icons.woff
260 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
208 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
208 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
143 ms
mw_joomla_logo-1.png
61 ms
CamoBoy_web.jpg
65 ms
international_conference_on_social_pediatrics_and_childrens_rights.png
65 ms
images.jpeg
59 ms
inrich_and_issop_logo.png
63 ms
4941866.jpg
60 ms
4941895.jpg
61 ms
5056140.jpg
61 ms
5469887.jpg
61 ms
5469904.jpg
61 ms
4941874.jpg
61 ms
5469901.jpg
63 ms
5469906.jpg
62 ms
overlay.png
47 ms
issop.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
issop.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
issop.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Issop.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Issop.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
issop.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ISSOP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: