6.5 sec in total
938 ms
4.7 sec
930 ms
Visit r.incredibox.com now to see the best up-to-date R Incredibox content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about r.incredibox.com
Take your business to new heights with the complete all-in-one digital marketing toolbox that's built to scale and adapt with you as you grow.
Visit r.incredibox.comWe analyzed R.incredibox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 938 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
r.incredibox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.1
89/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
938 ms
236 ms
677 ms
463 ms
585 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original R.incredibox.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Sendinblue.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Tags.sendinblue.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Sendinblue.com.
Page size can be reduced by 130.8 kB (64%)
205.8 kB
75.0 kB
In fact, the total size of R.incredibox.com main page is 205.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 145.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.7 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Incredibox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (80%)
44
9
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Incredibox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sendinblue.com
938 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
236 ms
home.css
677 ms
index.css
463 ms
style.min.css
585 ms
blocks.style.build.css
551 ms
styles.css
1072 ms
styles.css
733 ms
grid.min.css
903 ms
common.css
981 ms
default.min.css
967 ms
jquery.min.js
1065 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
975 ms
rellax-min.js
1256 ms
index-min.js
1258 ms
lodash.min.js
1752 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1785 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1330 ms
react.min.js
1331 ms
react-dom.min.js
1781 ms
escape-html.min.js
1780 ms
element.min.js
1780 ms
home-react.js
1782 ms
classlist-polyfill.min.js
2155 ms
mpp-frontend.js
2157 ms
index.js
2161 ms
main-min.js
2162 ms
common-min.js
2131 ms
header-min.js
2179 ms
linkedin-tracker-min.js
2663 ms
wpcf7-ebook-utm-link-min.js
2596 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
2596 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2597 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
119 ms
gtm.js
616 ms
logo-color.svg
1406 ms
arrow-1.svg
1464 ms
shield.jpg
1465 ms
OpenSans-Regular.woff
874 ms
OpenSans-Bold.woff
872 ms
PublicoHeadline-Bold-Web.woff2
784 ms
arrow-2.svg
1192 ms
analytics.js
220 ms
js
168 ms
api.min.js
358 ms
icn-ftr-1b.svg
370 ms
1f60d.svg
363 ms
icn-ftr-2b.svg
357 ms
otSDKStub.js
375 ms
r.incredibox.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
r.incredibox.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R.incredibox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R.incredibox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
r.incredibox.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of R Incredibox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: