2.7 sec in total
93 ms
2.3 sec
336 ms
Welcome to jamesandtaylor.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Jamesandtaylor best content right away, or after learning these important things about jamesandtaylor.co.uk
jamesandtaylor limited | Terracotta Tile Facade | Facing Brick System | Facade Metal facade engineering, glazed bricks, extruded aluminium, fusion glazes, terracotta facades, facade brick fixing,
Visit jamesandtaylor.co.ukWe analyzed Jamesandtaylor.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
jamesandtaylor.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
93 ms
99 ms
799 ms
67 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesandtaylor.co.uk, 25% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (9 requests) were made to S3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (799 ms) belongs to the original domain Jamesandtaylor.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 58.3 kB (3%)
1.9 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Jamesandtaylor.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.4 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamesandtaylor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 56 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesandtaylor.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (69%)
45
14
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesandtaylor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jamesandtaylor.co.uk
93 ms
www.jamesandtaylor.co.uk
99 ms
www.jamesandtaylor.co.uk
799 ms
bootstrap.min.css
67 ms
stylesheet.css
203 ms
overrides.css
236 ms
css
60 ms
jquery.min.js
53 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
57 ms
bootstrap.min.js
77 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
175 ms
core-bootstrap.js
183 ms
lightbox.min.js
360 ms
validator.min.js
180 ms
jquery.cookie.js
182 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
312 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
395 ms
wow.min.js
322 ms
jquery.event.move.js
429 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
499 ms
mmenu.js
390 ms
mmenu.css
339 ms
mhead.js
371 ms
mhead.css
452 ms
mburger.js
461 ms
mburger.css
476 ms
js
83 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
511 ms
js
91 ms
css2
56 ms
js
138 ms
api.js
68 ms
sdk.js
44 ms
certificate-renderer.js
357 ms
sr_1420711.jpg
453 ms
sr_1420712.jpg
515 ms
sr_1421977_large.jpg
745 ms
sr_1421978_large.jpg
737 ms
sr_1478760_large.jpg
689 ms
sr_1422133.jpg
617 ms
sr_1422134.jpg
699 ms
sr_1422129.jpg
690 ms
sr_1422132.jpg
798 ms
recaptcha__en.js
146 ms
sdk.js
43 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
188 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
200 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
214 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
200 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
200 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf
214 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
215 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
215 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
214 ms
209 ms
badge
515 ms
14-bespoke-website-design.png
413 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf
117 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf
116 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf
131 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEA.ttf
131 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEA.ttf
132 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEA.ttf
132 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEA.ttf
133 ms
jamesandtaylor.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jamesandtaylor.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jamesandtaylor.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesandtaylor.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesandtaylor.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jamesandtaylor.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamesandtaylor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: