Tools & Wizards About Us
jamescraik.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

jamescraik.com

国产免费爽爽视频-国产免费体验区-国产免费网站-国产免费无码-国产免费午夜a-国产免费午夜福利-国产免费小电影-国产免费小视频-国产免费亚洲-国产免费一级a

Page Load Speed

18.7 sec in total

First Response

8.6 sec

Resources Loaded

9.5 sec

Page Rendered

562 ms

jamescraik.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jamescraik content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jamescraik.com

国产免费爽爽视频,国产免费体验区,国产免费网站,国产免费无码,国产免费午夜a,国产免费午夜福利,国产免费小电影,国产免费小视频,国产免费亚洲,国产免费一级a。

Visit jamescraik.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamescraik.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8.6 sec and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamescraik.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.111

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamescraik.com

8630 ms

css.bootstrap.css

490 ms

css.core.css

563 ms

style.css

195 ms

jquery.js

449 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Jamescraik.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jamescraik.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 515.9 kB (54%)

Content Size

953.9 kB

After Optimization

438.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamescraik.com main page is 953.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 330.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 113.3 kB

  • Original 125.1 kB
  • After minification 110.3 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 330.8 kB
  • After minification 312.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamescraik images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 124.8 kB

  • Original 183.8 kB
  • After minification 177.3 kB
  • After compression 59.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 259.3 kB

  • Original 314.2 kB
  • After minification 310.6 kB
  • After compression 54.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamescraik.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 259.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (39%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamescraik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamescraik.com

jamescraik.com

8630 ms

css.bootstrap.css

css.bootstrap.css

490 ms

css.core.css

css.core.css

563 ms

style.css

style.css

195 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

449 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

330 ms

css

css

26 ms

style_childtheme.css

style_childtheme.css

410 ms

8.png

8.png

85 ms

09f2566ebe667914faa1aa8ec6e4ff0f-126.jpg

09f2566ebe667914faa1aa8ec6e4ff0f-126.jpg

1512 ms

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-74-250x150.jpg

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-74-250x150.jpg

218 ms

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-73-250x150.jpg

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-73-250x150.jpg

96 ms

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-72-250x150.jpg

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-72-250x150.jpg

113 ms

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-71-250x150.jpg

48ac366ef8000691a74f9c8733b5d12e-copia-copia-71-250x150.jpg

210 ms

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-49-250x150.jpg

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-49-250x150.jpg

200 ms

2a458f3f-a56a-4c19-91c0-e9ad099f96fa_9c2e7f7244b011e39d5d22000a1fbb3c_83.jpg

2a458f3f-a56a-4c19-91c0-e9ad099f96fa_9c2e7f7244b011e39d5d22000a1fbb3c_83.jpg

191 ms

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-48-250x150.jpg

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-48-250x150.jpg

270 ms

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-47-250x150.jpg

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-47-250x150.jpg

285 ms

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-46-250x150.jpg

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-46-250x150.jpg

355 ms

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

9 ms

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

16 ms

IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff

IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff

16 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

469 ms

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-45-250x150.jpg

83a3ceb0-b8ff-11e5-812c-8f57e4108e3e_8-copia-copia-10-45-250x150.jpg

151 ms

10514750_585184468274304_8423088922840805478_n6-250x150.jpg

10514750_585184468274304_8423088922840805478_n6-250x150.jpg

185 ms

1379441_10200929238053426_821579841_n1-300x202.jpg

1379441_10200929238053426_821579841_n1-300x202.jpg

174 ms

Afiche2-250x150.jpg

Afiche2-250x150.jpg

190 ms

image-250x150.jpg

image-250x150.jpg

72 ms

DSC0378-250x150.jpg

DSC0378-250x150.jpg

170 ms

BkuoJDmCQAA4j6t.jpg-large-250x150.jpg

BkuoJDmCQAA4j6t.jpg-large-250x150.jpg

96 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

399 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

104 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

331 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

206 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

99 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

98 ms

core.ajax.js

core.ajax.js

200 ms

core.jquery.js

core.jquery.js

720 ms

up-arrow.png

up-arrow.png

247 ms

140 ms

1821da5b0e16489e9be2f5f7d63343e8

1821da5b0e16489e9be2f5f7d63343e8

13 ms

Accessibility Review

jamescraik.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jamescraik.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jamescraik.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamescraik.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Jamescraik.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamescraik.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamescraik. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: