8.8 sec in total
320 ms
7.5 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing JB Cosmetic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jbcosmetic.co.uk
JB Cosmetic is an aesthetics & non cosmetic surgery clinic specialising in the treatment of Ellanse Dermal Lip Fillers & Botox in Cardiff, Bristol & Bath.
Visit jbcosmetic.co.ukWe analyzed Jbcosmetic.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
jbcosmetic.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.4 s
2/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.195
63/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
320 ms
2154 ms
273 ms
372 ms
300 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Jbcosmetic.co.uk, 13% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jbcosmetic.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 185.8 kB (24%)
758.4 kB
572.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Jbcosmetic.co.uk main page is 758.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 286.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 145.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JB Cosmetic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jbcosmetic.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (89%)
55
6
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JB Cosmetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jbcosmetic.co.uk
320 ms
jbcosmetic.co.uk
2154 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
273 ms
dashicons.min.css
372 ms
everest-forms.css
300 ms
twenty20.css
317 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
323 ms
font-awesome.min.css
325 ms
app.css
643 ms
style.css
523 ms
css
123 ms
js_composer.min.css
793 ms
lightslider.css
548 ms
gts-style.css
574 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
585 ms
frontend.min.css
942 ms
general.min.css
875 ms
jquery.min.js
967 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
955 ms
app.js
967 ms
ygf4ysh.js
250 ms
js
150 ms
lightslider.min.js
1018 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1105 ms
animate.min.css
1203 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1206 ms
all.min.css
1183 ms
jquery.twenty20.js
1213 ms
jquery.event.move.js
1263 ms
vendor.min.js
1635 ms
underscore.min.js
1412 ms
app.min.js
1495 ms
general.min.js
1459 ms
complianz.min.js
1493 ms
migrate.min.js
1537 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1653 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1700 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1736 ms
jquery.inputmask.bundle.min.js
1867 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1795 ms
everest-forms.min.js
1862 ms
mailcheck.min.js
1736 ms
ajax-submission.min.js
1729 ms
style.css
1502 ms
tag.js
1420 ms
gtm.js
217 ms
testimonials-hero-image.jpg
1136 ms
south-west-image.jpg
1153 ms
south-wales-image.jpg
1135 ms
analytics.js
682 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1141 ms
JB-COSMETIC-web-hi.png
839 ms
jb-logo-whitAsset-1.png
760 ms
home-hero-julie2.jpg
1458 ms
collect
32 ms
collect
321 ms
1f642.svg
459 ms
i
37 ms
i
110 ms
i
110 ms
i
108 ms
i
200 ms
i
138 ms
i
137 ms
i
138 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
297 ms
advert.gif
255 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
139 ms
jbcosmetic.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jbcosmetic.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jbcosmetic.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jbcosmetic.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jbcosmetic.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jbcosmetic.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JB Cosmetic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: