3.5 sec in total
199 ms
3.1 sec
139 ms
Click here to check amazing Jchoice content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jchoice.org
A not-for-profit charity website designed to engage and unite the Jewish giving community with meaningful Tzedakah choices for Mitzvah Projects.
Visit jchoice.orgWe analyzed Jchoice.org page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jchoice.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.0 s
0/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.9 s
2/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
199 ms
410 ms
194 ms
493 ms
285 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Jchoice.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.ak.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (961 ms) belongs to the original domain Jchoice.org.
Page size can be reduced by 666.0 kB (55%)
1.2 MB
548.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jchoice.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 635.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jchoice needs image optimization as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 457.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 457.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jchoice.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (49%)
76
39
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jchoice.org
199 ms
www.jchoice.org
410 ms
www.jchoice.org
194 ms
Index.aspx
493 ms
main.css
285 ms
newsscroll.css
288 ms
chromestyle.css
289 ms
user.css
477 ms
flashcss.css
288 ms
all.css
289 ms
sifr.js
379 ms
sifr-addons.js
380 ms
chrome.js
381 ms
tab.js
381 ms
player.js
381 ms
mootools.svn.js
665 ms
ufo.js
570 ms
jquery_003.js
667 ms
jquery.js
763 ms
jquery_004.js
477 ms
jquery_002.js
570 ms
aviary.js
668 ms
jquery-1.5.2.min.js
856 ms
common.js
665 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
761 ms
superfish.js
762 ms
slider-effect.js
761 ms
gallery.css
763 ms
WebResource.axd
858 ms
ScriptResource.axd
860 ms
ScriptResource.axd
860 ms
ScriptResource.axd
857 ms
ScriptResource.axd
859 ms
ScriptResource.axd
951 ms
ScriptResource.axd
952 ms
ScriptResource.axd
953 ms
ScriptResource.axd
955 ms
ScriptResource.axd
953 ms
ScriptResource.axd
954 ms
core.js
4 ms
ScriptResource.axd
961 ms
fonts.css
767 ms
ScriptServlet
28 ms
face-btn-01.gif
102 ms
Img_35.jpg
287 ms
Imgsmall_1.png
192 ms
Imgsmall_2.jpg
102 ms
instagram-icon.png
104 ms
face-icon-01.gif
103 ms
twi-icon-01.gif
191 ms
you-icon-01.gif
193 ms
flicker-icon-01.gif
193 ms
feed-icon-01.gif
194 ms
Cause326.png
286 ms
IM62.png
287 ms
Mithzvah_2714.jpg
287 ms
feed-icon-02.gif
288 ms
linkd-icon-02.gif
288 ms
you-icon-02.gif
382 ms
twi-icon-02.gif
382 ms
face-btn-02.gif
382 ms
instagram-icon22.png
382 ms
all.js
68 ms
bg-01.gif
362 ms
sep-01.gif
363 ms
faq-icon-01.gif
455 ms
header-middle-bg.gif
456 ms
logo-01.gif
455 ms
join-btn-01.gif
456 ms
sign-btn-01.gif
456 ms
nave-sep-01.gif
457 ms
join-btn-02.jpg
551 ms
box-01-left.jpg
551 ms
box-bg-01.gif
551 ms
box-sep-01.gif
551 ms
btn-bg-01.gif
551 ms
card-01.gif
552 ms
footer-bg.gif
645 ms
mail-icon01.gif
646 ms
subscribe-icon.png
646 ms
all.js
4 ms
39 ms
framd_1.woff
665 ms
fradm_0.woff
666 ms
frabk_0.woff
676 ms
jchoice.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
jchoice.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
jchoice.org SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jchoice.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jchoice.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jchoice.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jchoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: