8.9 sec in total
3.5 sec
5.2 sec
273 ms
Welcome to jd-editorial.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check JD Editorial best content right away, or after learning these important things about jd-editorial.co.uk
JD Editorial offers top-quality translation, and precise proofreading services, all at affordable prices, for students, businesses and authors.
Visit jd-editorial.co.ukWe analyzed Jd-editorial.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
jd-editorial.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.48
18/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
3487 ms
11 ms
100 ms
186 ms
337 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Jd-editorial.co.uk, 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Jd-editorial.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 303.2 kB (20%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Jd-editorial.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 899.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JD Editorial needs image optimization as it can save up to 198.5 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jd-editorial.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (67%)
58
19
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JD Editorial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jd-editorial.co.uk
3487 ms
analytics.js
11 ms
style.min.css
100 ms
style.css
186 ms
full-styles.6.1.5.css
337 ms
mkhb-render.css
193 ms
mkhb-row.css
194 ms
mkhb-column.css
201 ms
js_composer.min.css
289 ms
theme-options-production-1571651844.css
281 ms
jetpack.css
329 ms
font-awesome.min.css
32 ms
css
35 ms
css
46 ms
qb.css
327 ms
jquery.js
382 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
392 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
393 ms
rotating_tweet.js
395 ms
webfontloader.js
396 ms
frontend.min.js
400 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
483 ms
dom-ready.min.js
485 ms
photon.min.js
485 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
38 ms
gprofiles.js
48 ms
wpgroho.js
485 ms
comment-reply.min.js
484 ms
full-scripts.6.1.5.js
589 ms
mkhb-render.js
590 ms
mkhb-column.js
647 ms
wp-embed.min.js
647 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
647 ms
e-202433.js
42 ms
collect
36 ms
lid=340868%26tit%3D%26wid%3D300%26agt%3D1%26rak%3D1%26dis%3D0%26wri%3D0%26nrv%3D0%26rts%3DS%26theme%3Dlight
423 ms
css
105 ms
font
109 ms
dummy-transparent-ofjhhwurkf7pmfpqt0xqal7fh45tst92347lwyfb94.png
151 ms
dummy-transparent-ofjhhwum3ya5rcy0rydipg4zyjja5ggprj0h4dgz3o.png
175 ms
Logo-Horizontal-dark.png
170 ms
Logo-Horizontal-light.png
171 ms
Logo-Vertical-dark.png
239 ms
dummy-transparent-ofjhhwuosfl2agqsy76ol6rde87med6ozt0m6y5x9w.png
169 ms
embed
715 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
102 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
100 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
93 ms
admin-ajax-2-mpt29n2gvk1dx2gltodur8hxwwffmtmh2dkd651gvs.jpeg
326 ms
js
88 ms
admin-ajax-mpt1wqq73edqlp7353o5jho8gk040cf2mjai3g5y9k.jpeg
302 ms
6a3b16_debb481617724a77908f9bd614277b0d-mqnt8tbh59ah0keoyke1xxiurb2e2q0rfdf8sxb3qw.jpg
188 ms
12640460_1743638405866569_7428986791144557338_o-mpt15qt2spf94weusfjwxaxm852kxb8m8wqfvc70zc.jpg
208 ms
728c29e3-b58c-451e-9fb3-cae7bd211818-mpur7oyfitj41th73kgwd2one881omuz1xevcpwb08.jpg
179 ms
6a3b16_debb481617724a77908f9bd614277b0d-mqnt8tbed9ntolfr3qn08j2sof46o9yec2892x1pro.jpg
192 ms
admin-ajax-1-mpt2015pk1ybdhnbwgaxoipvsj5tauowr8ajrqc0c4.jpeg
122 ms
8314929977_36b1d58cf6_o-e1434705677527-mawhftfpn4yk37g5dm2vzbyw62l7zrx8nj7f7x8ddg.jpg
209 ms
font
19 ms
search.js
21 ms
geometry.js
36 ms
main.js
37 ms
jd-editorial.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jd-editorial.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jd-editorial.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jd-editorial.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jd-editorial.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jd-editorial.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JD Editorial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: