10.4 sec in total
874 ms
6.4 sec
3.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Jdjhf 2000 Jugem content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jdjhf2000.jugem.jp
ワードを調査している、私をお許しください。
Visit jdjhf2000.jugem.jpWe analyzed Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 874 ms and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
874 ms
533 ms
11 ms
360 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 154 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp, 13% (20 requests) were made to Imaging.jugem.jp and 6% (10 requests) were made to Plugins.mixi.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 262.0 kB (57%)
462.3 kB
200.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp main page is 462.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 264.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jdjhf 2000 Jugem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 155.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (67%)
125
41
The browser has sent 125 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jdjhf 2000 Jugem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp
874 ms
jm_style.css
533 ms
style.css
11 ms
cookie.js
360 ms
script.js
9 ms
widgets.js
86 ms
share.js
294 ms
load.php
372 ms
cookie.js
5 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
61XF13WMY1L._SL160_.jpg
31 ms
all_bg.gif
169 ms
search.gif
203 ms
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp
1120 ms
powered_07b.gif
333 ms
bg_header.gif
26 ms
logo_jugem.gif
24 ms
bg_dot.gif
25 ms
logo_pepabo.gif
25 ms
wrapper_bg.gif
358 ms
header.gif
356 ms
entry_head.gif
358 ms
ajs.php
96 ms
collect
26 ms
collect
83 ms
lg.php
39 ms
ajs.php
22 ms
compass.js
12 ms
12492.js
7 ms
lg.php
35 ms
all_bg.gif
5 ms
sync
26 ms
search.gif
5 ms
cookie_enabled_get_apac.html
345 ms
225912-15.js
130 ms
match.aspx
18 ms
powered_07b.gif
4 ms
ajs.php
476 ms
header.gif
17 ms
wrapper_bg.gif
3 ms
entry_head.gif
3 ms
ad
614 ms
a1040357.js
327 ms
lg.php
185 ms
jsk
337 ms
a1040359.js
161 ms
ic
397 ms
jsk
372 ms
135ff7a03585ffb5d1e497891fae04a7.jpg
521 ms
b
355 ms
pixel
84 ms
sync
7 ms
opt_icon.png
658 ms
opt_icon_text.png
703 ms
gl0
220 ms
emily.html
75 ms
pixel
136 ms
yads.js
549 ms
sync
4 ms
gl2
162 ms
ajs.php
24 ms
lg.php
15 ms
match.aspx
12 ms
sync
11 ms
225914-15.js
202 ms
usermatch
7 ms
usermatch
15 ms
VutNcMAoJUwAAEVWT7EAAACT%26617
47 ms
gr
27 ms
casaleopenrtb
37 ms
ecs
92 ms
usersync.aspx
34 ms
cs
32 ms
cs
205 ms
sync
364 ms
acs
162 ms
pixel
64 ms
crum
54 ms
crum
227 ms
acs
174 ms
casaleopenrtb
11 ms
crum
56 ms
rum
117 ms
crum
44 ms
m
46 ms
ajs.php
469 ms
ecc
65 ms
crum
18 ms
306 ms
acs
193 ms
crum
18 ms
cs
188 ms
cs
203 ms
yads_vimps-1.4.1.js
368 ms
tag
746 ms
cs
236 ms
lg.php
198 ms
share_button.html
447 ms
share_button.html
436 ms
share_button.html
444 ms
share_button.html
441 ms
share_button.html
442 ms
share_button.html
439 ms
share_button.html
655 ms
share_button.html
659 ms
share_button.html
653 ms
share_button.html
662 ms
tap.php
18 ms
sdk.js
412 ms
side_bg.gif
169 ms
side_header.gif
185 ms
side_list.gif
169 ms
dd.gif
193 ms
side_disc.gif
184 ms
side_bottomgif.gif
181 ms
footer.gif
503 ms
disp.php
635 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
142 ms
afr
57 ms
yads.js
473 ms
ri
9 ms
side_bg.gif
7 ms
side_list.gif
5 ms
side_header.gif
8 ms
side_disc.gif
9 ms
dd.gif
9 ms
side_bottomgif.gif
9 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.ja.html
250 ms
bt_check_6.png
197 ms
footer.gif
102 ms
yads-iframe.html
192 ms
gcs
360 ms
gcs
360 ms
tag
406 ms
86 ms
xd_arbiter.php
238 ms
xd_arbiter.php
513 ms
play_icon.gif
330 ms
tag
476 ms
jot.html
29 ms
9fcd20de35c156a70cda1f4dcfc25651
18 ms
yads-iframe.html
202 ms
pd
60 ms
260e535a-30b3-e556-0dfb-403b4334c517
66 ms
pixel
29 ms
oi
408 ms
sd
32 ms
sd
43 ms
sd
34 ms
tag
370 ms
sd
9 ms
oi
388 ms
sd
26 ms
QC_300_250.jpg
691 ms
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
EUC-JP
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jdjhf2000.jugem.jp main page’s claimed encoding is euc-jp. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
jdjhf2000.jugem.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jdjhf 2000 Jugem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: