2.6 sec in total
97 ms
2.3 sec
210 ms
Click here to check amazing Jeemain 2016 Results content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jeemain2016results.in
JEE Main Results 2017, jee main exam 2017 results declared at www.jeemain.nic.in, joint entrance exam final results 2017 will be announced on 27 april 2017, jee online exam results 2017,JEE Schedule,...
Visit jeemain2016results.inWe analyzed Jeemain2016results.in page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
jeemain2016results.in performance score
97 ms
26 ms
12 ms
24 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Jeemain2016results.in, 12% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (536 ms) relates to the external source 3.bp.blogspot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 312.7 kB (48%)
654.5 kB
341.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Jeemain2016results.in main page is 654.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 487.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jeemain 2016 Results images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 248.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.8 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (31%)
52
36
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jeemain 2016 Results. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jeemain2017results.in
97 ms
3730162741-widget_css_bundle.css
26 ms
adsbygoogle.js
12 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.min.js
17 ms
halamanav.js
268 ms
bg_body.gif
24 ms
ca-pub-7667901965053101.js
150 ms
zrt_lookup.html
157 ms
show_ads_impl.js
47 ms
JEE%252B2016.png
383 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
153 ms
home.gif
44 ms
%3C!--Can't%20find%20substitution%20for%20tag%20[post.thumbnailUrl]--%3E
36 ms
chemistry.JPG
333 ms
chemistry.JPG
368 ms
total%2Bquestions.JPG
369 ms
JEE%2BMains%2B2017%2BRank%2BPredictor%2BCalculator.JPG
536 ms
maths.JPG
331 ms
physics.JPG
242 ms
authorization.css
128 ms
ads
221 ms
osd.js
40 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
39 ms
ads
262 ms
summary
69 ms
ads
99 ms
abg.js
68 ms
osd_listener.js
76 ms
ads
234 ms
likebox.php
165 ms
ads
253 ms
pla
42 ms
VMo7O5e5aMO.css
73 ms
BWRIL9-XbYW.js
115 ms
JrFVMrRpAYB.js
137 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
105 ms
3652
117 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
4 ms
cookie_push.html
7 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
8 ms
m
256 ms
transparent.png
59 ms
10373716_897546003594959_6501992193060377237_n.jpg
42 ms
21150029_110947019638997_7623296321938434452_n.jpg
30 ms
12047152_10154367032557814_6031232454415145605_n.jpg
30 ms
20196_685910174852362_6267257759717662118_n.jpg
32 ms
14642407_572285759622652_7846029006346661816_n.jpg
47 ms
11149504_1428287330806789_4309466545359528314_n.jpg
32 ms
19030446_437910623232729_4818221878007553668_n.jpg
38 ms
20882297_1424875134233203_148813159672639101_n.jpg
60 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
21 ms
08daff19b2e87c380bd85c246028e6b0.gif
214 ms
ic
154 ms
pixel
13 ms
pixel
21 ms
1x1
3 ms
jeemain2016results.in SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jeemain2016results.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jeemain2016results.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jeemain2016results.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jeemain 2016 Results. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: