4 sec in total
323 ms
2.7 sec
985 ms
Click here to check amazing Jelf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jelf.com
One of the UK’s leading insurance brokers. We invest the time to get to know and understand our clients. From commercial insurance to risk management, employee health and benefits and private clients ...
Visit jelf.comWe analyzed Jelf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
jelf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value4,050 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.667
8/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
323 ms
893 ms
172 ms
254 ms
388 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jelf.com, 57% (27 requests) were made to Marshcommercial.co.uk and 9% (4 requests) were made to Bat.bing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (924 ms) relates to the external source Marshcommercial.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 128.8 kB (16%)
794.6 kB
665.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Jelf.com main page is 794.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 403.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jelf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jelf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)
45
21
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jelf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jelf.com
323 ms
www.marshcommercial.co.uk
893 ms
marsh.css
172 ms
styles.css
254 ms
osano.js
388 ms
ai.2.min.js
66 ms
api.js
41 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
416 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
239 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js
234 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js
329 ms
form.validate.min.js
336 ms
form.tracking.min.js
330 ms
form.conditions.min.js
383 ms
formsextensions.validate.min.js
332 ms
app.js
924 ms
gtm.js
106 ms
icons.svg
206 ms
marsh-commercial-logo.svg
205 ms
marsh-commercial-logo---white.svg
227 ms
marsh-commercial-insurance-brokers.jpg
211 ms
mc-insurer-logos_v4.svg
325 ms
a-and-s-recruitment-logo.png
570 ms
health-wealth-and-happiness-campaign-banner.png
496 ms
embodied-bear-logo.png
570 ms
ukrr-banner-image.png
436 ms
oxygen-hero-image.jpg
435 ms
mc-technology-hero-banner.jpg
580 ms
mc-transport-hero-banner.jpg
589 ms
facebook.svg
667 ms
linkedin.svg
688 ms
twitter.svg
687 ms
874016817
130 ms
recaptcha__de.js
30 ms
1737793213-f3753dc82bd61a0cb6bdb98205d56e21e17617aaa62170deb1e4687642a77a56-d
77 ms
js
81 ms
148 ms
insight.min.js
194 ms
fbevents.js
159 ms
bat.js
142 ms
infinitytrack.js
154 ms
45 ms
211023378.js
39 ms
257574472118691
116 ms
211023378
22 ms
0.7.20
14 ms
pd.js
16 ms
jelf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jelf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
jelf.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jelf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jelf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jelf.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jelf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: