Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

jeofly.com

微信html5微网站建设、手机WAP网站Apps策划设计,VPS云服务器租用托管-上海久飞科技

Page Load Speed

11.2 sec in total

First Response

691 ms

Resources Loaded

10.2 sec

Page Rendered

334 ms

jeofly.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jeofly.com now to see the best up-to-date Jeofly content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jeofly.com

上海久飞科技(www.jeofly.com)是一个专为江浙沪地区用户提供专业微信网站建设,html5网站制作,移动手机网站设计,PC网站策划开发,微信服务号、订阅号网站,手机应用Apps(Android 和 IOS)应用开发,域名注册,虚拟空间主机,VPS,云VPS,企业邮局,云服务器租用,服务器租用,服务器托管等业务的互联网公司。上海久飞科技竭诚为您提供专业的微信、html5微网站、PC网站、移...

Visit jeofly.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jeofly.com page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jeofly.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jeofly.com

691 ms

hntcwl.css

437 ms

eltReset.css

414 ms

FG_css.css

424 ms

qqkf.css

425 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Jeofly.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Wpa.qq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Jeofly.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Jeofly.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 31.0 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 52.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jeofly images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jeofly.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (28%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jeofly. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jeofly.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jeofly.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

jeofly.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jeofly.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jeofly.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jeofly. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: