1 sec in total
113 ms
850 ms
80 ms
Click here to check amazing JEpoque content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jepoque.com
Visit jepoque.comWe analyzed Jepoque.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 930 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
jepoque.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
113 ms
49 ms
42 ms
42 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jepoque.com, 33% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 584.9 kB (64%)
918.3 kB
333.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jepoque.com main page is 918.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 730.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 581.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 581.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 539 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JEpoque images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)
25
15
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JEpoque. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jepoque.com
113 ms
minified.js
49 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
42 ms
polyfill.min.js
42 ms
thunderbolt-commons.0c1b09d9.bundle.min.js
33 ms
main.6ee538dd.bundle.min.js
155 ms
lodash.min.js
157 ms
react.production.min.js
34 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
157 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
169 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
170 ms
98157e_6d0c554c54574403a97f4a7b651de143~mv2_d_3508_2480_s_4_2.png
291 ms
bundle.min.js
73 ms
98157e_5e795dc094834922b5eab4ec299d9972~mv2.jpg
188 ms
98157e_9329244bba394bbf9f58a818435045d9~mv2.jpg
198 ms
98157e_74b27aca3334455a87a652da92b70f03~mv2.jpg
177 ms
98157e_60eb03adaa96454c9cc224aa4e768d24~mv2.jpg
257 ms
98157e_60eb03adaa96454c9cc224aa4e768d24~mv2.jpg
187 ms
98157e_130400854a5642a39b12df47cf9d5185~mv2.jpg
330 ms
98157e_130400854a5642a39b12df47cf9d5185~mv2.jpg
350 ms
98157e_59c31836b8694cc59c44f1655c3cb876~mv2.jpg
308 ms
98157e_59c31836b8694cc59c44f1655c3cb876~mv2.jpg
318 ms
128 ms
125 ms
120 ms
116 ms
120 ms
118 ms
187 ms
157 ms
161 ms
155 ms
153 ms
147 ms
9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff
11 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
10 ms
bolt-performance
30 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
9 ms
jepoque.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
jepoque.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jepoque.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jepoque.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jepoque.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jepoque.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JEpoque. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: