Tools & Wizards About Us
jetem.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

jetem.ru

Jetem - Powered by vBulletin

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

244 ms

jetem.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit jetem.ru now to see the best up-to-date Jetem content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jetem.ru

Ex: forums.khv.ru

Visit jetem.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Jetem.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jetem.ru performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jetem.ru

248 ms

jetem.ru

910 ms

style-90732284-00001.css

116 ms

vbulletin_important.css

231 ms

yahoo-dom-event.js

460 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Jetem.ru, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Jetem.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.1 kB (80%)

Content Size

113.3 kB

After Optimization

22.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jetem.ru main page is 113.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 103.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 90.2 kB

  • Original 103.6 kB
  • After minification 98.2 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jetem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 140 B

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 752 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jetem.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 752 B or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (48%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jetem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jetem.ru

jetem.ru

248 ms

jetem.ru

jetem.ru

910 ms

style-90732284-00001.css

style-90732284-00001.css

116 ms

vbulletin_important.css

vbulletin_important.css

231 ms

yahoo-dom-event.js

yahoo-dom-event.js

460 ms

connection-min.js

connection-min.js

345 ms

vbulletin_global.js

vbulletin_global.js

347 ms

vbulletin_menu.js

vbulletin_menu.js

348 ms

brand

brand

7 ms

vbulletin_md5.js

vbulletin_md5.js

358 ms

vbulletin_read_marker.js

vbulletin_read_marker.js

362 ms

brandjs.js

brandjs.js

16 ms

jetem-logo.gif

jetem-logo.gif

116 ms

navbits_start.gif

navbits_start.gif

123 ms

forum_old.gif

forum_old.gif

117 ms

clear.gif

clear.gif

117 ms

icon1.gif

icon1.gif

119 ms

lastpost.gif

lastpost.gif

116 ms

forum_link.gif

forum_link.gif

230 ms

collapse_tcat.gif

collapse_tcat.gif

230 ms

icon5.gif

icon5.gif

230 ms

post_old.gif

post_old.gif

230 ms

collapse_thead.gif

collapse_thead.gif

239 ms

whos_online.gif

whos_online.gif

249 ms

stats.gif

stats.gif

343 ms

forum_new.gif

forum_new.gif

344 ms

cron.php

cron.php

1887 ms

branding.png

branding.png

18 ms

navibg.gif

navibg.gif

333 ms

menu_open.gif

menu_open.gif

344 ms

context.js

context.js

1050 ms

gradient_tcat.gif

gradient_tcat.gif

116 ms

gradient_thead.gif

gradient_thead.gif

122 ms

45 ms

hit

hit

492 ms

Accessibility Review

jetem.ru accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

jetem.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

jetem.ru SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jetem.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jetem.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jetem.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jetem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: