2.6 sec in total
208 ms
2.2 sec
190 ms
Visit jetlife.co now to see the best up-to-date JETLIFE content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jetlife.co
Your Destination For All Things FLY
Visit jetlife.coWe analyzed Jetlife.co page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Jetlife.co rating and web reputation
jetlife.co performance score
208 ms
806 ms
32 ms
100 ms
136 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Jetlife.co, 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) belongs to the original domain Jetlife.co.
Page size can be reduced by 414.6 kB (27%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Jetlife.co main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 944.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JETLIFE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 230.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 230.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jetlife.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (59%)
51
21
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JETLIFE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jetlife.co
208 ms
www.jetlife.co
806 ms
ga.js
32 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
100 ms
portfolio-slideshow.min.css
136 ms
public.css
135 ms
style.css
137 ms
jquery.js
221 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
153 ms
sharebar.js
189 ms
superfish.js
216 ms
supersubs.js
216 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
217 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
242 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
256 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
282 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
282 ms
twitter.js
290 ms
zilla-custom-styles.css
484 ms
336x280.js
66 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
290 ms
portfolio-slideshow.min.js
322 ms
pinit.js
18 ms
jquery.custom.js
348 ms
wp-embed.min.js
347 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
css
23 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
bsa.js
25 ms
pin_it_button.png
22 ms
cloud-tile1.gif
172 ms
JL%20banner.jpeg
465 ms
sprite.png
171 ms
plus.png
170 ms
1187ac4bbb9d6565841bdd5e4be391df-580x580.jpg
302 ms
65b84037a6527d5dc13c7c03ba02daa4-580x773.jpg
259 ms
bff8690ad295b4f60ccedee3b783f768-580x865.jpg
409 ms
190677-580x388.jpg
303 ms
AzRAAjY-580x378.jpg
320 ms
630x355-580x326.jpg
463 ms
047c08970910b7fe7c7d73931af60060-580x580.jpg
474 ms
4a8db09a7f5b3e3641de38de5a21261f-580x580.jpg
532 ms
2577c0091e1a6eedefb98a00ef25fe65-580x870.jpg
540 ms
unnamed-580x386.jpg
503 ms
737fcc7ded670352c1d673ff02ddbb08-580x321.jpg
721 ms
Ferrari-F12berlinetta.-Robb-Report%E2%80%99s-2014-Car-of-the-Year-600x358-580x346.jpg
702 ms
bg-footer.jpg
558 ms
yAXhog6uK3bd3OwBILv_SKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
10 ms
all.js
161 ms
analytics.js
4 ms
jetlifecompany.json
45 ms
collect
21 ms
pinit_main.js
57 ms
117 ms
xd_arbiter.php
142 ms
xd_arbiter.php
248 ms
jetlife.co SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jetlife.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jetlife.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jetlife.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JETLIFE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: