Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

jibble.org

Jibble - Paul Mutton

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

635 ms

jibble.org screenshot

About Website

Visit jibble.org now to see the best up-to-date Jibble content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jibble.org

Home page of Paul Mutton - Java developer, photographer and penetration tester/security consultant.

Visit jibble.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Jibble.org page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jibble.org performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value31,000 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jibble.org

205 ms

www.jibble.org

177 ms

simple.css

70 ms

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

40 ms

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Jibble.org, 14% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 12% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 57.2 kB (50%)

Content Size

114.0 kB

After Optimization

56.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Jibble.org main page is 114.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 48.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 27.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jibble images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 48.8 kB
  • After minification 48.6 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 526 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jibble.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (37%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jibble. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jibble.org accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jibble.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jibble.org SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jibble.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jibble.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jibble. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: