4.1 sec in total
274 ms
2.8 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Jmd content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jmd.im
Jean-Marc is a multidisciplinary designer, currently working as product design manager for Facebook Messenger. Previously Google Daydream, Google Inbox, Google GMail and Sparrow. Passionate about abou...
Visit jmd.imWe analyzed Jmd.im page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
jmd.im performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value2.8 s
82/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
274 ms
173 ms
165 ms
168 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Jmd.im, 16% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jmd.im.
Page size can be reduced by 578.6 kB (9%)
6.2 MB
5.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Jmd.im main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jmd images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 269.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmd.im needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (22%)
23
18
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jmd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jmd.im
274 ms
bootstrap.css
173 ms
style.css
165 ms
animate.css
168 ms
ionicons.min.css
185 ms
font-awesome.min.css
190 ms
css
24 ms
jquery-2.1.0.min.js
470 ms
bootstrap.js
250 ms
blocs.js
247 ms
jmd-profile.jpg
973 ms
jmdlogowhite@2x.png
92 ms
google-logo-title@2x.jpg
165 ms
inbox-logo-main@2x.jpg
526 ms
inbox-all.jpg
1267 ms
sparrow-logo-title@2x.jpg
100 ms
sketchdesign-logo-main@2x.jpg
531 ms
sparrow-all.jpg
1313 ms
jmd-logo-title@2x.jpg
247 ms
sparrow-logo-main@2x.jpg
731 ms
cubetwist.gif
1880 ms
motiondrops.gif
1884 ms
infinite_swirl.gif
1968 ms
tracertransitions.gif
1462 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
7 ms
vDvcuXwZxUMLuTfuLrSLpA.ttf
10 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
19 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
19 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
20 ms
ionicons.ttf
1360 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1403 ms
jmd.im accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jmd.im best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jmd.im SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmd.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jmd.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmd.im
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jmd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: