4.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.7 sec
379 ms
Welcome to jmpe.net homepage info - get ready to check JMPE best content right away, or after learning these important things about jmpe.net
Electrical Engineering - by JMPE - Santa Barbara, Bakersfield, Santa Maria, CA, John Maloney Professional Engineer Full Service Electrical Design Company
Visit jmpe.netWe analyzed Jmpe.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jmpe.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
1147 ms
65 ms
100 ms
156 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Jmpe.net, 42% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jmpe.net.
Page size can be reduced by 173.5 kB (20%)
855.1 kB
681.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Jmpe.net main page is 855.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 342.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JMPE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 787 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmpe.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (73%)
40
11
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JMPE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jmpe.net
1147 ms
js
65 ms
wp_head.css
100 ms
wug-gallery.css
156 ms
magnific-popup.css
161 ms
lightslider.min.css
162 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
115 ms
js
69 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
144 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
159 ms
jquery.min.js
266 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
scripts.min.js
296 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
168 ms
masonry.min.js
264 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
280 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
281 ms
lightslider.min.js
282 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
292 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
293 ms
isotope-3.0.1.min.js
293 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
333 ms
jquery.mobile.js
333 ms
common.js
360 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
402 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
360 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
360 ms
embed
244 ms
embed
477 ms
embed
519 ms
sandc.jpg
241 ms
logo-new.jpg
298 ms
showcase-6.jpg
448 ms
channel-islands-boating-center.jpg
447 ms
showcase-5.jpg
448 ms
preloader.gif
349 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
82 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
95 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
95 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
97 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
97 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
93 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
93 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
119 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
120 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
120 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
116 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
119 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
119 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
185 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
183 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
184 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
184 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
183 ms
modules.woff
195 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df213aeEGma.woff
185 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df213aeEGmZ.ttf
189 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2sHaeEGma.woff
186 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2sHaeEGmZ.ttf
186 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2mXaeEGma.woff
188 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2mXaeEGmZ.ttf
187 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df27naeEGma.woff
188 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df27naeEGmZ.ttf
191 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2AnGeEGma.woff
190 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2AnGeEGmZ.ttf
190 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2MHGeEGma.woff
190 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2MHGeEGmZ.ttf
191 ms
js
121 ms
geometry.js
16 ms
search.js
21 ms
main.js
23 ms
style.min.css
63 ms
jmpe.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jmpe.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jmpe.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmpe.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmpe.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmpe.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JMPE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: