Tools & Wizards About Us
jodhpurwebdesigner.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

Web Designing Company In Jodhpur | #1 Creative Web Development Services In Jodhpur

Page Load Speed

14.2 sec in total

First Response

623 ms

Resources Loaded

13.1 sec

Page Rendered

419 ms

jodhpurwebdesigner.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jodhpur Web Designer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jodhpurwebdesigner.com

Web Designing Company in Jodhpur - Jodhpur Web Designer is a leading Web Design Company in Jodhpur. Feel free to contact for the best web designing services in Jodhpur. We have Creative Web Developmen...

Visit jodhpurwebdesigner.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jodhpurwebdesigner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 623 ms and then it took 13.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jodhpurwebdesigner.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,730 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.321

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

623 ms

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

1142 ms

fbevents.js

58 ms

js

96 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

780 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Jodhpurwebdesigner.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jodhpurwebdesigner.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 307.8 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jodhpurwebdesigner.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 612.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 193.9 kB

  • Original 231.2 kB
  • After minification 228.2 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 193.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

  • Original 394.3 kB
  • After minification 300.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jodhpur Web Designer needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 612.4 kB
  • After minification 612.4 kB
  • After compression 602.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 126.4 kB
  • After minification 126.1 kB
  • After compression 116.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jodhpurwebdesigner.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (86%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jodhpur Web Designer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

623 ms

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

1142 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

58 ms

js

js

96 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

780 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

849 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

855 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

906 ms

styles.css

styles.css

901 ms

wonderplugincarouselengine.css

wonderplugincarouselengine.css

907 ms

wonderplugingridgalleryengine.css

wonderplugingridgalleryengine.css

1576 ms

style.css

style.css

1650 ms

base.css

base.css

1646 ms

layout.css

layout.css

1986 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

1991 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1717 ms

jquery.ui.all.css

jquery.ui.all.css

2365 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.css

jplayer.blue.monday.css

2410 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

2424 ms

css

css

83 ms

css

css

99 ms

all.css

all.css

79 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

95 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2757 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2771 ms

layerslider.utils.js

layerslider.utils.js

3082 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

3696 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

3206 ms

wonderplugincarouselskins.js

wonderplugincarouselskins.js

3211 ms

wonderplugincarousel.js

wonderplugincarousel.js

3764 ms

wonderplugingridlightbox.js

wonderplugingridlightbox.js

3797 ms

wonderplugingridgallery.js

wonderplugingridgallery.js

4095 ms

js

js

96 ms

js

js

99 ms

counter.js

counter.js

91 ms

style-2.css

style-2.css

4023 ms

style-1.css

style-1.css

3955 ms

content.css

content.css

4456 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

4545 ms

index.js

index.js

4607 ms

index.js

index.js

4744 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

4770 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

4904 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

5230 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

5323 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

5408 ms

api.js

api.js

86 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

6050 ms

menu.js

menu.js

4821 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

4819 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

5181 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

5501 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

5352 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

5467 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

4890 ms

index.js

index.js

5222 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

5248 ms

jquery-actual.min.js

jquery-actual.min.js

5330 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

5200 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

5166 ms

verge.min.js

verge.min.js

4838 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

5253 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

5235 ms

jquery-strongslider.min.js

jquery-strongslider.min.js

5064 ms

controller.min.js

controller.min.js

5140 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

4871 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

4775 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

5264 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

4713 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

4854 ms

wpforms-modern.min.js

wpforms-modern.min.js

4904 ms

logo-66x75.ico

logo-66x75.ico

4689 ms

b1.png

b1.png

1122 ms

b1.webp

b1.webp

4637 ms

234.png

234.png

5119 ms

b2.png

b2.png

1888 ms

font

font

33 ms

font

font

40 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

23 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

32 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

41 ms

t.php

t.php

87 ms

mfn-icons.woff

mfn-icons.woff

5337 ms

contact-box.png

contact-box.png

5125 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

6076 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

4762 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

21 ms

UWD-web.gif

UWD-web.gif

4480 ms

box_shadow.png

box_shadow.png

1250 ms

bg_panel.png

bg_panel.png

1520 ms

jodhpur-weblogo.png

jodhpur-weblogo.png

1729 ms

Accessibility Review

jodhpurwebdesigner.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jodhpurwebdesigner.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jodhpurwebdesigner.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jodhpurwebdesigner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jodhpurwebdesigner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jodhpurwebdesigner.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jodhpur Web Designer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: