2.1 sec in total
366 ms
1.6 sec
156 ms
Visit johnfront.com now to see the best up-to-date Johnfront content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about johnfront.com
John Front is the Portfolio of Ivan Tsankov, a Freelance Designer. Specializing in Web Design, Graphic Design and Retouching
Visit johnfront.comWe analyzed Johnfront.com page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
johnfront.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
366 ms
394 ms
129 ms
218 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Johnfront.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnfront.com.
Page size can be reduced by 19.3 kB (22%)
89.5 kB
70.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Johnfront.com main page is 89.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 40.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 946 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Johnfront needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnfront.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)
11
7
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnfront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnfront.com
366 ms
www.johnfront.com
394 ms
bootstrap.css
129 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
218 ms
style.css
223 ms
jquery-latest.js
30 ms
modernizr-2.5.3.min.js
234 ms
plugins.js
424 ms
font-awesome.css
116 ms
font-awesome-ie7.css
111 ms
follow_button.1347008535.html
72 ms
logo.png
110 ms
icons.png
229 ms
helveticace-webfont.woff
120 ms
f.gif
11 ms
jot
51 ms
show.json
5 ms
helveticace-webfont.ttf
128 ms
helveticace-webfont.svg
120 ms
johnfront.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
johnfront.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
johnfront.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnfront.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnfront.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnfront.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Johnfront. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: